Critically Analyze the Management Problems Brought about by the Co-production of Multiple Companies

Authors

  • Qingnan Huang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v9i3.9655

Keywords:

Management, Co-production, Public Management.

Abstract

Multi -department cooperation has become a modern development trend. Together with the public sector and the private sector and the volunteer departments, public services not only accelerate efficiency to protect citizen rights and interests, but also help the development of social organizations. Out of the purpose of solving people's problems faster and serving the people, multiple departments work together. However, the values, goals, and the differences of corporate culture have brought many problems. In order to better protect the rights and interests of the people, different organizations need to run in and tolerate each other. This article is committed to solving complex interpersonal relationships, and system management caused by multiple departments. Putting members of different departments and each department seek common ground and mutual respect to promote the public service industry. Research and analyze the organizational goals and incentive methods of various organizations, and help explore managers from the root cause of conflict, resolve contradictions, improve work efficiency, and promote the positive development of the public service industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Z. Huang. Contract logic and basic meaning of enterprise incentive goal theory. Foreign Economics & Management. 2007(2):10–16.

R. Yang and X. Yin. Principle of management science. Beijing: Posts & Telecom Press Co., Ltd.; 2012.

Z. Peng. Public sector human resource management. Shanghai: Tongji University Press; 2007.

D. Giauque, S. Anderfuhren-Biget, and F. Varone. HRM practices, intrinsic motivators, and organizational performance in the public sector. Public Personnel Management. 2013; 42(2):123–150.

G. Cui. Research on incentive mechanism of human resource management in public sector. Quality & Market. 2021(17):91–93.

D. Zhang. Modern management science. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press; 2007.

J. Wang. The analysis of three models of government-nonprofit cooperation in public service. Chinese Public Administration. 2009(10):77–80.

P. F. Drucker. The practice of management paperback. London: Routledge; 2006.

Q. Fang. Recognition of human resource management in public sector. China Storage & Transportation. 2021(7):87–88.

G. Abramo, C. A. D'Angelo, and F. Di Costa. The scholarly impact of private sector research: a multivariate analysis. Journal of Informetrics. 2021; 15(3):101191. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101191

S. Zhou, C. Chen, and M. Lu. Principles and methods of management. Shanghai: Fudan University Press; 2005.

J. Cunningham. Strategic human resource management in the public arena: A managerial perspective. London: Palgrave; 2016.

G. Li. Relationships between government and social organization in public services. Scientific Decision-Making. 2011(7):31–48.

W. Huang and Y. Liu. Organizational behavior. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press; 2005.

D. P. Moynihan and S. K. Pandey. The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review. 2007; 67(1):40–53.

Downloads

Published

28-06-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Huang, Q. (2023). Critically Analyze the Management Problems Brought about by the Co-production of Multiple Companies. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 9(3), 201-203. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v9i3.9655