A Multimodal Analysis of Human Imitation of AI and Human–Machine Relations: A Case Study of 50 TikTok Videos

Xi Wang

doi:10.54097/erdsd586

Authors

Xi Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/erdsd586

Keywords:

Human Imitation of AI, Human–machine Relations, Multimodality, Theory of Mimicry, Generative AI

Abstract

In recent years, the proliferation of illogical and “grotesque” AI-generated videos on social media has given rise to a cultural trend in which humans imitate AI in reverse. This form of mimicry, which takes AI characteristics as its creative source, has drawn increasing scholarly attention. This study conducts an empirical investigation into the phenomenon of human imitation of AI, analyzing 50 sample cases extracted from the Douyin platform. By applying Norris’s multimodal interaction analysis framework, the research further examines the multimodal characteristics of such content. The findings suggest that in the era of intelligent media, mimicry evolves into a phenomenon of multi-directional co-construction and symbiosis between humans and algorithms. While such videos share common multimodal features and serve primarily as meme-like cultural dissemination, they also reflect underlying anxieties about human–machine relations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zheng Guocheng and Yuan Aiqing. Humor, Imitation, and Deconstruction of Generative AI in the Age of Smart Media——Taking "Human Imitating AI" short videos as an example. Journal of Shanxi Youth Vocational College, 2025,38(01):7-12.

[2] Du Botong. Imitation and Carnival: Analysis of the "Reverse AI Challenge" Video Phenomenon on TikTok Platform. Audiovisual, 2025, (15):92-96.

[3] Norris, S. 2004. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Routledge.

[4] Zhong Jianqin. Human-machine collaborative content production mode. Youth Journalist, 2020(36):44-45.

[5] Zhou Li and Chen Mu 'en. "Encountering the' Algorithmic Time Machine': The Technological Integration of AI-ized Memory and Subject Evasion". Journal of Journalism and Communication Studies, 2024,31(01):67-82+127.

[6] Ding Fangzhou, Zhang Duo. "Is AI Just Your Tool?" Research on the Human-AI Relationship between Short Video Bloggers and AI in the--Intelligent Communication Ecosystem. Journal of Journalism University, 2025(01):1-14+119.

[7] Jiang Qiaolei and Shi Mengsu. The Significance Clash in the Intelligent Era: Human-Machine Relationships and Meaning Perception in Collaborative Creativity. Journal of Journalism University, 2025(02):1-14+117.

[8] Schmitt, B.Speciesism: An Obstacle to AI and Robot Adoption.Marketing Letters,2020, 31(1),3-6.

[9] Ni Wan and Guo Jialiang. The Essence and Value of AI Artistic Creation from the Perspective of Mediaization. Modern Communication, Journal of Communication University of China, 2024,46(08):95-103.

[10] Li Yabin and Liu Qingjun. A Preliminary Discussion on Imitation Theory from Ancient Greece to the Eighteenth Century. Art Observation, 2023(12):77-78.

[11] Zhan Di and Fang Jieyun. Sensory synesthesia in digital audiovisual production under the perspective of "Technology-Culture Evolution Theory". Editorial Friends, 2025(02):56-63.

[12] Sun Yuting. A Brief Analysis of Imitation Behavior in TikTok Short Video Spectacle. New Media Research, 2020,6(04):90-91.

[13] Zhang Tingyu. Initial Exploration on the Development of TikTok Platforms in the New Media Context. Journal of Journalism and Communication, 2023(05):46-48.

[14] Suchman, Lucy. Human-Machine Reconfigurations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

[15] Haraway, Donna." A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist - Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century." In Simians,Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.New York:Routledge,1991,149 - 181.

[16] Zhan Di, Fang Jieyun. The Cyborg’s Mask: The Generative Mechanism of Collective Performativity in Short Video Production. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), 2025, 47 (01): 117-124.