AutoFlow-MO: An Automated Planning Method of Experimental Process Flows for Multi-Object Demands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/0b60ew57Keywords:
Automated Process Planning, Resource-Constrained Scheduling, Space-Time Cooperative A Algorithm*, Knowledge-Driven Formalization, Conflict ResolutionAbstract
The intelligent planning and scheduling of complex Test Support Systems (TSS) are critical for the efficient and safe operation of large-scale experimental facilities. However, traditional manual scheduling and static rule-based paradigms struggle to manage the high-dimensional, non-linear coupling between multi-object concurrent demands and stringent physical resource constraints. To address this NP-hard problem, this paper proposes a novel automated process planning framework driven by multi-dimensional physical constraints and data-driven heuristics. First, a knowledge-driven formalization mechanism utilizing an improved K-Means++ clustering strategy with Mahalanobis distance is established to accurately map heterogeneous, unstructured test demands into computable mathematical models. Subsequently, a hierarchical dependency model and a multi-dimensional resource configuration conflict matrix are constructed. Combined with domain-knowledge-guided heuristic traversal algorithms, this formulation successfully decouples severe spatial-temporal competition and eliminates resource deadlocks among coupled subsystems. Finally, to navigate the massive constraint space, a Space-Time Cooperative A* algorithm integrated with Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) is proposed. This approach effectively filters physically infeasible paths and consistently locates Pareto optimal scheduling schemes that balance minimum task response delays with optimal energy consumption. Ultimately, the proposed methodology fundamentally shifts experimental process planning towards a highly autonomous paradigm, providing robust decision-making support for the efficiency and safety enhancement of complex test facility clusters.
Downloads
References
[1] Smith S F, Cesta A. Temporal logic based sequence mining for scheduling large-scale scientific facilities[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS). 2022.
[2] Li X, Zhang C, Gao L, et al. A Graph Neural Network-Based Method for Process Planning With Process Elements Topology [J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2022, 18(11): 7561-7571.
[3] Xia H, Liu Z, Eynard B, et al. A knowledge graph-based digital twin for process planning[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2021, 71: 102149.
[4] Zhang H, Liu J, Wang Y. Ontology-based process decision reasoning method for complex aviation structural parts[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 27(5): 1234-1245.
[5] Wang J, Li Y, Zhang W. Process parameter optimization for manufacturing using conditional generative adversarial networks[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2023, 68: 123-135.
[6] Tang L, Meng Y. Energy-Efficient Scheduling for Steel Production With Time-of-Use Electricity Prices[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2021, 51(1): 123-134.
[7] Bertsimas D, Ebrahimian M, Kallus N. Robust Markov Decision Processes with Uncertain Transition Matrices[J]. Operations Research, 2021, 69(5): 1567-1585.
[8] Wang L, Pan Z, Jing C. Knowledge Transfer-Based Reinforcement Learning for Job Shop Scheduling Under Uncertainty[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2022, 52(8): 8976-8988.
[9] Chen W, Xu J, Wu Y. Visual Analytics for Large-Scale Pipeline Scheduling and Resource Allocation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2023, 29(1): 123-133.
[10] Zhang Z, Tang R, Peng T. A reinforcement learning-based adaptive scheduling framework for process planning in smart manufacturing[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2022, 33: 1-15.
[11] Deb K, Jain H. An Improved NSGA-III Procedure for Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2022.
[12] Liu B, Wang L. Enhanced evolutionary algorithm with Latin Hypercube Sampling initialization for production scheduling[J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2023, 78: 101289.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

