Cislunar Transportation Optimization Framework Based on Weighted Multi-Objective Optimization and Negative Binomial Reliability Modeling

Authors

  • Qizhen Guo
  • Zixuan Shi
  • Mengxin Gao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/42b2yb62

Keywords:

Multi-Objective Optimization, Negative Binomial Reliability Model, Hybrid Transportation Optimization Model

Abstract

This paper develops a decision-making framework for large-scale Earth–Moon material transportation that balances transportation efficiency and economic cost. We first construct transportation models for both the space elevator system and conventional rocket launches, characterizing their operational behavior through capacity constraints and cost functions. Based on these models, we develop a hybrid transportation optimization model that allocates cargo mass between different transportation routes. We then formulate a weighted multi-objective optimization model to jointly optimize transportation time and total cost. To account for uncertainty in rocket launches, we introduce a reliability analysis framework based on the negative binomial distribution, which captures the influence of launch success probability on transportation duration and cost. Numerical results show that the proposed framework achieves a stable trade-off between efficiency and cost while maintaining robust performance under varying launch reliability conditions. The framework provides a practical modeling approach for planning large-scale space transportation systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen Fujian, Liu Benmin, Guo Zhongyin, et al. Reliability Model of Road Transportation Systems Based on Bayesian Analysis [J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 39(02): 220-225.

[2] Li Xin, Zhang Yali, Li Song, et al. Capacity Optimization of Hybrid Energy Storage Systems Based on Improved NSGA-II [J]. Thermal Power, 2024, 53(12): 49-56. DOI:10.19666/ j.rlfd. 202405113.

[3] Zhang Zixian, Guan Wei, Qigqi. Path Optimization for Hazardous Materials Transportation Based on Multi-Agent Meta-Reinforcement Learning [J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Informatics, 2024, 22(03): 93-106. DOI:10. 19961/ j.cnki.1672-4747.2024.02.013.

[4] Zhou Jinlong, Zhang Yinggui, Xiao Yang, et al. Multi-Objective Path Optimization Model and Algorithm for Multimodal Transport under Uncertain Time Constraints [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information, 2024, 24(06): 193-205. DOI:10.16097/j. cnki. 1009-6744.2024.06.017.

[5] NASA. (2022). Artemis Program Overview. NASA.

[6] Hu Ying, Liu Xiongyan, Cui Junxia. Dynamic Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm Based on Dual Strategy and Its Application [J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2025, 31(09): 3376-3390. DOI: 10.13196/j.cims.2025.0028.

[7] Jones, H. W. (2018). The Recent Large Reduction in Space Launch Cost. NASA Ames Research Center.

[8] SpaceX. (2023). Falcon 9 Launch Vehicle User Guide. SpaceX.

[9] Koelle, D. E. (2003). Handbook of Cost Engineering for Space Transportation Systems. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

[10] Deb, K. (2001). Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons.

[11] Ross, S. M. (2014). Introduction to Probability Models (11th ed.). Academic Press.

[12] Gao Peigen. Research on Small-Sample Modeling and Reliability Optimization Design under Mixed Uncertainty [D]. Southwest University of Science and Technology, 2024. DOI: 10. 27415/d.cnki.gxngc.2024.001078.

Downloads

Published

30-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Guo, Q., Shi, Z., & Gao, M. (2026). Cislunar Transportation Optimization Framework Based on Weighted Multi-Objective Optimization and Negative Binomial Reliability Modeling. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 15(3), 70-76. https://doi.org/10.54097/42b2yb62