Multi-View Deep Clustering for Depression Subtype Identification Across Multi-Band EEG Topographies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/qxc1mq54Keywords:
Multi-view Deep clustering, Depression subtypes, EEG Topographic.Abstract
The significant heterogeneity of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) necessitates objective subtyping that transcends traditional symptomatology. With the development of machine learning algorithms, using machine learning to identify potential biomarkers has emerged as an efficient approach. However, existing machine learning-based studies on depression are mostly limited to simple binary classification or rely on pre-set features. This study validates a novel unsupervised framework, integrating a CNN-Transformer with the DEMVC model, to identify depression subtypes from resting-state EEG topographies across different frequency bands. The results show that the fusion of multi-band significantly superior to single-band approaches in clustering stability and subtype separability. Specifically, the Alpha-Beta-Theta combination emerged as the best band combination. Ablation studies further revealed the distinct roles of the frequency bands: the Theta band captures core depressive pathology, whereas the Alpha band may be better considered as an indicator of 'near-healthy status' rather than a mere disease marker. This study innovatively takes multi-bands as multi-view inputs for multi-view deep clustering, resolving the challenge of classifying depression subtypes and providing a robust and explicable new paradigm for this task.
Downloads
References
[1] Simmatis L, Russo E E, Geraci J, et al. Technical and clinical considerations for electroencephalography-based biomarkers for major depressive disorder. npj Mental Health Research, 2023, 2: 18.
[2] Miljevic A, Bailey N W, Murphy O W, et al. Alterations in EEG functional connectivity in individuals with depression: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2023, 328: 287-302.
[3] Li P, Yokoyama M, Okamoto D, et al. Resting-state EEG features modulated by depressive state in healthy individuals: insights from theta PSD, theta-beta ratio, frontal-parietal PLV, and sLORETA. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2024, 18: 1384330.
[4] Yu D, Li P, Su F, et al. Automatic detection of depression using a CNN-Transformer model based on low-channel EEG data. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 2025, 33(5): 594-612.
[5] Wan Chen, Yanping Cai, Aihua Li, et al. Depression EEG classification based on multi-scale convolutional transformer network. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2025.
[6] Zhou H Y, Zhao Z Z, Gao Z H, et al. Identification of Depression Subtypes Based on EEG and Machine Learning. In: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT '21). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022: 302-306.
[7] Zhang Y, Wu W, Toll R T, et al. Identification of psychiatric disorder subtypes from functional connectivity patterns in resting-state electroencephalography. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 2021, 5(4): 309-323.
[8] Sharpley C F, Evans I D, Bitsika V, et al. An Exploratory Comparison of Alpha and Beta Network Connectivity Across Four Depression Subtypes. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025, 14(15): 5295.
[9] Ren Y, Pu J, Yang Z, et al. Deep clustering: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2024, 36(4): 5858-5878.
[10] Xu J, Ren Y, Li G, et al. Deep embedded multi-view clustering with collaborative training. Information Sciences, 2021, 573: 279-290.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

