Optimal LQR Controller Design for Wheel Legged Robots Using Genetic Algorithm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/nypsmn77Keywords:
Wheel-legged Robot, Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Parameter Tuning, Genetic Algorithm and Gain SchedulingAbstract
Wheel-legged robots are typical nonlinear underactuated systems, whose balance control is commonly achieved by a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). However, the performance of the LQR controller for such robots heavily depends on the selection of the state weighting matrix Q and the control weighting matrix R, which in practice relies highly on expert heuristics and often fails to achieve an efficient trade-off among multiple performance objectives. To address this issue, this paper proposes a systematic automatic tuning method for LQR controllers of wheel-legged robots. By embedding engineering constraints into the fitness function in the form of penalty terms, the proposed method can stably generate feasible controllers that achieve favorable multi-performance trade-offs without manual trial‑and‑error. On this basis, for variable leg‑length conditions, a grid‑based offline solution of the Riccati equation combined with polynomial fitting is employed to extend the optimal weightings obtained at the nominal leg length to the entire leg‑length range via gain scheduling, enabling online continuous adaptation of the feedback gain with respect to leg length. Simulation results on a nonlinear model demonstrate that the controller automatically optimized by the genetic algorithm (GA) exhibits good dynamic response and robustness under various scenarios, including balancing control, fall recovery, and terrain adaptation, thereby validating the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Downloads
References
[1] Wang, S., et al. (2021). Balance control of a novel wheel-legged robot: Design and experiments. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 6782–6788). Xi’an, China. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ ICRA 48506. 2021.9561474.
[2] Bjelonic, M., et al. (2019). Keep rollin’—Whole-body motion control and planning for wheeled quadrupedal robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 4(2), 2116–2123. https://doi. org/ 10.1109/LRA.2019.2900926.
[3] Klemm, V., et al. (2020). LQR-assisted whole-body control of a wheeled bipedal robot with kinematic loops. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 5(2), 3745–3752. https://doi.org/ 10. 1109/ LRA.2020.2979641.
[4] Cao, H., Lu, B., Liu, H., Liu, R., & Guo, X. (2022). Modeling and MPC-based balance control for a wheeled bipedal robot. In 2022 41st Chinese Control Conference (CCC) (pp. 420–425). Hefei, China. https://doi.org/10.23919/ CCC55837.2022. 984 9614.
[5] Pan, Z., Li, B., Jing, H., Niu, Z., & Wang, R. (2023). Wheel-leg collaborative control for wheel-legged robots based on MPC with preview. In 2023 IEEE International Automated Vehicle Validation Conference (IAVVC) (pp. 1–8). Austin, TX, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAVVC57639.2023.10262256.
[6] Klemm, V., et al. (2019). Ascento: A two-wheeled jumping robot. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 7515–7521). Montreal, QC, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793693.
[7] Dong, J., Liu, R., Lu, B., Guo, X., & Liu, H. (2022). LQR-based balance control of two-wheeled legged robot. In 2022 41st Chinese Control Conference (CCC) (pp. 450–455). Hefei, China. https://doi.org/10.23919/CCC55837.2022.9849496.
[8] Xin, G., et al. (2021). Robust footstep planning and LQR control for dynamic quadrupedal locomotion. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(3), 4488–4495. https://doi.org/10. 1109/ LRA.2021.3069025.
[9] Lavretsky, K. W. E. (2013). Robust and adaptive control with aerospace applications (1st ed.). Springer-Verlag.
[10] Li, Z., Yang, C., & Fan, L. (2012). Advanced control of wheeled inverted pendulum systems. Springer Publishing Company.
[11] Liu, J. K. (2017). Intelligent control (4th ed.). Publishing House of Electronics Industry. (In Chinese)
[12] Aremu, M. B., Abdel-Nasser, M., Alyazidi, N. M., & El-Ferik, A. S. (2024). Disturbance observer-based bio-inspired LQR optimization for DC motor speed control. IEEE Access, 12, 152418–152429. https://doi.org/10. 1109/ACCESS. 2024. 345 2677.
[13] Ma, R., Tan, Q., Liu, X., et al. (2026). Active disturbance rejection control for permanent magnet linear synchronous motors using an enhanced particle swarm optimization algorithm. Electric Machines and Control, 30(2), 36–48.
[14] D’Antuono, V., De Matteis, G., Trotta, D., & Zavoli, A. (2023). Optimization of UAV robust control using genetic algorithm. IEEE Access, 11, 122252–122272. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ ACCESS. 2023.3329494.
[15] Wang, Y., Xiong, G., Fu, G., et al. (2026). Research on sliding mode active disturbance rejection control for quadrotor UAVs based on an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/61.1479.V.20260206.0930.002.
[16] Khatoon, S., Chaturvedi, D. K., Hasan, N., & Istiyaque, M. (2017). Optimal control of a double inverted pendulum by linearization technique. In 2017 International Conference on Multimedia, Signal Processing and Communication Technologies (IMPACT) (pp. 123–127). https://doi.org/ 10. 1109/ MSPCT.2017.8363932.
[17] Gao, J., Jin, H., Gao, L., Zhu, Y., Zhao, J., & Cai, H. (2025). Jump control based on nonlinear wheel-spring-loaded inverted pendulum model: Validation of a wheeled-bipedal robot with single-degree-of-freedom legs. Biomimetics, 10, 246. https:// doi. org/10.3390/biomimetics10040246.
[18] Chen, J., He, N., Xu, Z., Dou, M., & He, L. (2025). Design and implementation of a novel two-wheeled composite self-balancing robot for stationary operations in unknown terrain. IEEE Access, 13, 86032–86045. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ ACCESS. 2025.3499457.
[19] Chen, M., Ma, H., & Wang, J. (2026). Stabilization of an 8-DoF wheeled bipedal robot via whole-body control with integrated LQR and MPC. In 2026 2nd International Conference on Electrical Automation and Artificial Intelligence (ICEAAI) (pp. 555–560). Guangzhou, China.
[20] Wang, S., et al. (2020). Gain scheduled controller design for balancing an autonomous bicycle. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 7595–7600). Las Vegas, NV, USA. https://doi. org/ 10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9340956.
[21] Kalman, R. (1959). On the general theory of control systems. IRE Transactions on Automatic Control, 4(3), 110. https://doi. org/10.1109/TAC.1959.1104866.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

