Centrality-driven Sparse Optimal Control of Belief Formation in Social Networks

Authors

  • Bo Wang College of Intelligent Robotics and Advanced Manufacturing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/htnq1v67

Keywords:

Complex Networks, Dynamical Systems, Optimal Control, Sparse Actuation, Structural Centrality, Numerical Simulation

Abstract

 This paper studies the problem of steering collective beliefs in social networks when only a small fraction of nodes can be directly influenced. We propose a sparse optimal control framework built on the Network Drift-Diffusion Model (NDDM). Two intervention mechanisms are considered: direct control and latent (indirect) control. To select which nodes to actuate, we compare six centrality measures---Degree, Betweenness, Eigenvector, Closeness, PageRank, and K-shell---and keep only the top 5\%--30\% as control inputs. The optimal feedback law follows from the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation, which reduces to solving Riccati-type differential equations. We test our approach on Erdős-Rényi (ER), Barabási-Albert (BA), and Watts-Strogatz (WS) networks. The results show that the best centrality choice depends strongly on the network topology, and the system undergoes phase transitions as control parameters vary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Sui, D., Liu, Y., & Leng, S. (2026). Socially inspired adaptive framework for distributed online inference. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 13, 5924–5942. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2026.3653651.

[2] Jadbabaie, A., Molavi, P., Sandroni, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2012). Non-Bayesian social learning. Games and Economic Behavior, 76(1), 210–225.

[3] Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Yang, K. C., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2018). The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature Communications, 9(1), 4787.

[4] Johnson, N. F., Velásquez, N., Restrepo, N. J., Leahy, R., Gabriel, N., El Oud, S., Zheng, M., Manrique, P., Wuchty, S., & Lupu, Y. (2020). The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views.Nature, 582(7811), 230–233.

[5] Jiang, H., Mazalov, V. V., Gao, H., & Wang, C. (2023). Opinion dynamics control in a social network with a communication structure. Dynamic Games and Applications, 13(1), 412–434.

[6] Etesami, S. R. (2021). Open-loop equilibrium strategies for dynamic influence maximization game over social networks. IEEE Control Systems Letters, 6, 1496–1500.

[7] Wang, C., Mazalov, V. V., & Gao, H. (2021). Opinion dynamics control and consensus in a social network. Automation and Remote Control, 82(6), 1107–1117.

[8] Zhang, J., & Luo, Y. (2017). Degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality in social network. In 2017 2nd International Conference on Modelling, Simulation and Applied Mathematics (MSAM2017) (pp. 315–318). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/msam-17.2017.68.

[9] Ruhnau, B. (2000). Eigenvector-centrality — A node-centrality? Social Networks, 22(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ S0378-8733(00)00031-9.

[10] Zhang, P., Wang, T., & Yan, J. (2022). PageRank centrality and algorithms for weighted, directed networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 586, 126438. https: // doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126438.

[11] Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.

[12] Erdős, L., Knowles, A., Yau, H. T., & Yin, J. (2013). Spectral statistics of Erdős–Rényi graphs I: Local semicircle law.The Annals of Probability, 41(3B), 2279–2345. https://doi.org/10. 1214/ 11-AOP734.

[13] Zadorozhnyi, V. N., & Yudin, E. B. (2012). Structural properties of the scale-free Barabasi-Albert graph. Automation and Remote Control, 73(4), 702–716. https://doi. org/10. 1134/ S0005117912040091.

[14] Chen, Y. W., Zhang, L. F., & Huang, J. P. (2007). The Watts–Strogatz network model developed by including degree distribution: Theory and computer simulation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 40(29), 8237–8246. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/29/003.

Downloads

Published

30-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, B. (2026). Centrality-driven Sparse Optimal Control of Belief Formation in Social Networks. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 17(2), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.54097/htnq1v67