The Problems of “Artificial Intelligence” in Modern Philosophy and Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v3i2.7692Keywords:
Technologies and methods, Patriotic education, Higher education institutionsAbstract
Patriotism, an important component of the Chinese national spirit, has inspired generations of Chinese to strive for national prosperity. Promoting patriotism and implementing patriotic education is an eternal topic. If the youth is robust, the country will be strong. Because college students are the vital force of the country and the hope of the nation, it is especially important to cultivate their patriotism. China is facing new challenges, with profound changes in domestic and foreign situations, rapid technological development and increasingly frequent Internet exchanges. The patriotic education environment has also become more complex under the impact of undesirable Western culture. With the external and internal influences, further patriotic education for college students still faces many challenges. We should face up to the problems in contemporary patriotism education in higher education institutions, explore the solutions and cultivate patriotism among college students in the new era. Therefore, the study of patriotism education in higher education institutions has important theoretical and practical significance.
This paper mainly collates literature through literature and historical research method, and the combination of theory and practice, analyzes the problems and causes of patriotism education in higher education institutions with contemporary society, college and family education as well as the characteristics of college students themselves, and puts forward targeted countermeasures for solutions. In the main body, this paper is divided into four parts. First of all, there is an introduction, which mainly includes the background and significance of research, the current status of domestic and international research, research methods, innovations and deficiencies. The framework of the paper was determined to be based on relevant domestic and international studies and the theory was well prepared for the article. The second part mainly elaborates the theories and necessity of patriotism education for college students, mainly including the connotation and characteristics of patriotism education. The third part presents a comprehensive analysis of the problem of patriotic education of college students and its causes from the social environment, patriotic education in higher education institutions, family education and college students themselves. The fourth part is the core of this paper, the practical effect of patriotic education in higher education institutions is ensured, by summarizing the relevant theories and proposing effective technologies and methods against the corresponding problems.
Downloads
References
Donald Gillies (12 March, 2020), Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy of Science from the 1990s to 2020.
Bengio, Y., Courville, A. and Vincent, P. (2013) Representation learning: A review and new perspectives, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(8), pp. 1798–1828.
Bishop, C. M. (ed.) (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition, Oxford University Press.
Buchanan, B.G., and Feigenbaum, E.A. (1978) DENDRAL and Meta-DENDRAL: Their Applications Dimension, Artificial Intelligence, 11, pp. 5-24.
Davis, R., Buchanan, B.G., and Shortliffe, E.H. (1977) Production Systems as a Representation for a Knowledge-Based Consultation Program’, Artificial Intelligence, 8, pp. 15-45.
Gillies, D. (1996) Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Method, Oxford University Press.
Kasparov, G. K. and Greengard, M. (2017) Deep thinking: where machine intelligence ends and human creativity begins, John Murray.
Anderson, A.R. (1956) The formal analysis of normative systems. Reprinted in The Logic of decision and action (ed. Rescher, N.). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Aqvist, L. (1965) A new approach to the logical theory of interrogatives, part I. Uppsala: Uppsala Philosophical Association.
Church, A. (1956) Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fogel, L. J., Owens, A. J. & Walsh, M. J. (1966) Artificial Intelligence through simulated evolution. New York: John Wiley
Green, C. (1969) Theorem-proving by resolution as a basis for question-answering systems. Machine Intelligence 4, pp. 183-205 (eds Meltzer, B. & Michie, D.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hintikka, J. (1967a) A program and a set of concepts for philosophical logic. The Monist, 51, 69-72.
Kripke, S. (1963a) Semantical considerations on modal logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 16, 83-94.
Manna, Z. (1968b) Formalization of properties of programs. Stanford Artificial Intelligence Report: Project Memo AI-64.
J. McCarthy, P. J. Hayes; Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence.
Aamodt, Agnar, and Plaza, Enric, ‘Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches’. In: AI Communications 7 (1994), pp. 39-59.
Aamodt, Agnar, and Nygård, Mads, ‘Different roles and mutual dependencies of data, information, and knowledge – an AI perspective on integration’. In: Data and Knowledge Engineering 16 (1995), pp. 191-122.
Brey, Philip, ‘Hubert Dreyfus: Humans versus computers’. To appear in: Achterhuis, H. (ed.), American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn, Indiana University Press, 2001.
Russell, Stuart, and Norvig, Peter, Artificial Intelligence: A modern approach, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1995.


