Preliminary study on angiogenesis and functional evaluation of benign adrenal pheochromocytoma vessels
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ijbls.v1i1.2270Keywords:
Pheochromocytoma, Angiogenesis, MVD, VEGF, FunctionAbstract
Objective: To study the relationship between the pheochromacytomas’ MVD and VEGF expression which are two indexes of angiogenesis, and analyze the difference of MVD and VEGF expression in different groups of pheochromocytomas with the purpose of correlating pheochromocytoma’s function and angiogensis. Methods From June 2009 to December 2015, thirty-one patients histologically diagnosed as benign pheochromocytoma were divided into two groups according to the length of preparing time before operation(group 1≦2 weeks, group 2>2 weeks), and eight normal adrenal glands as the control group. The MVD and VEGF expression of all the pheochromocytomas and normal adrenal glands were evaluated, with the purpose of correlating the MVD and VEGF expression and analyzing the difference among of two groups of pheochromocytomas and normal adrenal glands. The tumors’ diameter, intratumoral necrosis and the patients’ urine VMA were also analyzed with MVD and VEGF expression. Results :1) The mean value of MVD in group 1 is 50.2±15.4 per HP, and less than the group 2 with the mean value 69.5±3.8 per HP(p<0.05), but more than the normal adrenal glands with the mean value 35.1±3.4 per HP(p<0.05). There is no MVD mean value difference between groups divided according to tumors’ diameter, intratumoral necrosis and the patients’ urine VMA. There is 30.8% high VEGF expression in group 1 less than group 2 with 77.8%(p<0.05), and there no high VEGF expression rate difference between groups divided according to tumors’ diameter, intratumoral necrosis and the patients’ urine VMA; The MVD correlates with VEGF expression in pheochromocytomas (r=0.545, p<0.05). Conclusion :1) The function of pheochromocytoma maybe correlate with the angiogenesis. 2) The angiogenesis of pheochromocytoma was more than that of the normal adrenal gland. 3)There are no correlation with the angiogenesis and tumor’s diameter, intratumoral necrosis and the patients’ urine VMA in this study.
Downloads
References
Lenders JW, Eisenhofer G, Mannelli M, et al. Phaeochromocytoma[J]. Lancent, 2005, 366(9486): 665-675.
Lenders JW, Duh QY, Eisnehofer G, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2014, 99(6): 1915-1942.
Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Dahia PL, Robledo M, et al. An update on the genetics of paraganglioma, pheochromocytoma, and associated hereditary syndromes[J]. Horm Metab Res, 2012, 44(5): 328-333.
Weingarten TN, Cata JP, O’Hara JF, et al. Comparison of two preoperative medical management strategies for laparoscopic resection of pheochromocytoma[J]. Urology, 2010, 76(2): 508.e6-11.
J Hasan, R Byers, GC Jayson. Intra-tumoural microvessel density in human solid tumours[J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2002, 86(10): 1566-1577.
Thompson LDR. Pheochromocytoma of the adrenal gland scaled score(PASS) to separate benign from malignant neoplasms: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic study of 100 cases[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2002, 26(5): 551-566.
Weidner N. Intratumor microvessel density as a prognostic factor in cancer[J]. Am J Pathol, 1995, 147(1): 9-19.
Bialas M, Dyduch G, Dudala J, et al. Study of microvessel density and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factors in adrenal gland pheochromocytomas[J]. Int J Endocinol, 2014, 2014: 104129.
Renard J, Clerici T, Licker M, et al. Pheochromocytoma and abdominal paraganglioma[J]. J Visc Surg, 2011, 148(6): e409-416.
Pan Dongliang, Li Hanzhong, Zeng Zheng accompany. Investigation of the clinical functional grade and preoperative preparation criteria for pheochromocytoma [J]. The Chinese Journal of Urology, 2004,42 (18): 1089-1092.
Li Hanzhong, Zhang Yuyu. Perioperative management of pheochromocytoma / paraganglioma [J]. Journal of Modern Urology, 2012,17 (4): 329-332.
Nadler A, Cukier M, Rowsell C, et al. Ki-67 is a reliable pathological grading marker for neuroendocrine tumors[J]. Virchows Arch, 2013, 462(5): 501-505.
Laforga JB, Aranda FI. Angiogenic index: a new method for assessing microvascularity in breast carcinoma with possible prognostic implications[J]. Breast J, 2000, 6(2): 103-107.
Kather JN, Max A, Reyes-Aldasoro CC, et al. Continuous representation of tumor microvessel density and detection of angiogenic hotspots in histological whole-slide images[J]. Oncotarget, 2015, 6(22): 19163-19167.
Feng F, Zhu Y, Wang X, et al. Predictive factors for malignant pheochromocytoma: analysis of 136 patients[J]. J Urol, 2011, 185(5): 1583-1590.
Favier J, Iqaz P, Burnichon N, et al. Rationale for anti-angigenic therapy in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma[J]. Endocr Pathol, 2012, 23(1):34-42.
Wang X, Li K, Sun H, et al. Tumoral angiogenesis in both adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas: a promising computed tomography biomarker for diagnosis[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2016, 9: 1823-1830.
Bernini GP, Moretti A, Bonadio AG, et al. Angiogenesis in human normal and pathologic adrenal cortex[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2002, 87(11): 4961-4965.
Favier J, Plouin P-F, Corvol P, et al. Angiogenesis and vascular architecture in pheochromocytoma: distinctive traits in malignant tumors[J]. Am J Pathol, 2002, 161(4): 1235-1246.
Oudijk L, van Nederveen F, Badoual C, et al. Vascular pattern analysis for the prediction of clinical behaviour in pheochromocytomas and paraganglionas[J]. PloS one, 2015, 10(3): e0121361.
Bredholt G, Mannelqvist M, Stefansson IM, et al. Tumor necrosis is an important hallmark of aggressive endometrial cancer and associates with hypoxia, angiogenesis and inflammation response. Oncotarget, 2015, 6(37): 39676-3969.


