Prediction of Bleeding Risk After Gastrointestinal Surgery Combined with Spectral Analysis and Construction of Nursing Monitoring Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/t82s0v64Keywords:
Bleeding Risk, After Gastrointestinal Surgery, Spectral Analysis, Nursing Monitoring, Dynamic Risk Prediction ModelAbstract
Postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding is a key problem affecting prognosis, and traditional monitoring methods have limitations such as lag and insufficient sensitivity. In this study, Raman spectroscopy, near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and fluorescence spectroscopy were integrated to construct a dynamic risk prediction model (DRPM) and a graded nursing monitoring system to achieve active prevention and accurate management of postoperative bleeding. In this paper, the spectrum of 400-1000nm band near the anastomotic site was collected by the proximal endoscopic adaptive fiber probe, and the oxygen saturation (StO₂) and total hemoglobin (tHb) of mesenteric tissue were monitored by the distal percutaneous NIRS patch, and the key spectral parameters such as ΔHbT and HIR were extracted. DRPM model fuses spectral core indicators with clinical parameters such as preoperative coagulation function and anastomotic type, and uses adaptive weighted integration method to generate comprehensive risk score, and dynamically adjusts the weights of spectral factors, clinical factors and dynamic trend factors to optimize early warning efficiency. At the same time, a three-level early warning response mechanism was established, and differentiated monitoring and intervention (grade I observation, grade II alert and grade III intervention) were implemented according to the risk score, and the bleeding point was accurately identified by combining spatial positioning technology. The validation results showed that among 312 patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery, the sensitivity (94.7%) and specificity (92.5%) of the DRPM model for grade II/III bleeding were significantly higher than those of traditional methods (68.4%, 84.6%), with a warning lead time of 4.8 ± 1.2 hours and a false alarm rate reduced to 7.4%; The incidence of bleeding in patients with grade III risk stratification is 100%, and the accuracy of spatial positioning error ≤ 2cm is 86.5%. In terms of clinical benefits, the experimental group's reoperation rate decreased by 69.7% and the average length of hospital stay was shortened by 23.9%, confirming that this model can improve the efficiency of bleeding warning, promote the transformation of postoperative management from passive treatment to active prevention, and provide a new paradigm for interdisciplinary and integrated complication management.
Downloads
References
[1] Li Zijia,Zhao Yingyin,Shi Jiankun,Liang Chujun,Zhang Shimin,Zheng Jiayi... & Zhao Yang.(2025).Association of Intraoperative Hypotension with Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.Anesthesiology, 143(3), 582-592.
[2] Yinchao Zhang,Chao Li,Linze Xu,Jin Zhang,Dandan Wu,Yu Bai & Huikai Li.(2025).The safety and efficacy of NEPA in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia during gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study..Translational cancer research,14 (7), 4369-4380.
[3] Andrei Gurau,Olivia Monton,Jonathan B Greer,Norman G Nicolson & Fabian M Johnston.(2024).Racial Disparities in the Use of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer.. Journal of surgical oncology,131(6),1118-1124.
[4] Ling Zhu,Jun Cheng,Fei Xiao & Yan Yan Mao.(2024).Effects of comprehensive nutrition support on immune function, wound healing, hospital stay, and mental health in gastrointestinal surgery..World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 16(12),3737-3744.
[5] Odysseas P. Chatzipanagiotou & Timothy M. Pawlik.(2024). ASO Author Reflections: Impact of Area Deprivation on Days at Home Following Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery.Annals of Surgical Oncology,32(4),1-2.
[6] Kei Harada,Yusuke Uemoto,Keiji Nagata,Taisuke Matsuoka, Ippei Yamana,Toshifumi Watanabe... & Takahisa Fujikawa. (2024). The effect of anticoagulation therapy on the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive major gastrointestinal surgery..Surgical endoscopy,39(2),1-9.
[7] Nanako Kawata,Mitsuyoshi Yoshida,Ayu Sakai,Tsuyoshi Tanaka,Gaku Inaguma,Koichi Suda & Akitsugu Ohuchi. (2024). Relationship between the number of remaining teeth and postoperative delirium in patients after gastrointestinal surgery..Geriatrics & gerontology international, 25(1), 90-95.
[8] Michael G Fadel,Josephine Walshaw,Francesca Pecchini, Marina Yiasemidou,Matthew Boal,Muhammed Elhadi... & European Robotic Surgery Consensus (ERSC) study group. (2024).A pan-European survey of robotic training for gastrointestinal surgery: European Robotic Surgery Consensus (ERSC) initiative.. Surgical endoscopy,39(2),1-15.
[9] Taishi Hata,Hiroyuki Yamamoto,Masataka Ikeda,Hiroaki Nagano, Ichiro Takemasa,Takeshi Naitoh... & Yuichiro Doki. (2024). Status of perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in gastrointestinal surgery based on national clinical database (NCD) data in Japan..Surgery today,55(6),1-9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

