Study on the Cognitive Mechanisms of Stigmatized Discourse Production in Western Media Based on Cognitive Attention

Authors

  • Cuicui Zang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i3.14450

Keywords:

Stigmatization; Stigmatized discourse; Cognitive attention; Proximization theory; Western media discourse.

Abstract

Stigma is the negative interpreation of a certain individual/group by a stigmatizer for a specific purpose under the influence of public opinion. In order to break the state of being stigmatized, the key is to understand the generation processes of stigmatized discourses. This study puts forward a theoretical framework for analyzing the cognitive mechanisms and strategies of stigmatized discourse generation by combining cognitive attention with proximization theory. In order to validate this framework, this study then takes the western reports on Russia-Ukraine conflict as an example to analyze its production strategies both in terms of cognition and language. It turns out that the framework has strong explanatory power in investigating the generation processes, different attention strategies and the language expressions of the stigma. It is helpful to understand the cognitive operation behind stigmatization and select the corresponding anti-stigma discourse to de-construct these negative conceptualizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Croft, W. & D. A. Cruse. Cognitive Linguistics[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Hart, C. Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publication Company, 2011.

Hart, C. Riots engulfed the city: an experimental study investigating the legitimating effects of fire metaphors in discourses of disorder[J]. Discourse and Society, 2018, 3: 279-298.

Kopytowska, M., L. Grabowski. & J. Wozniak. Mobilizing against the Other: Cyberhate, refugee crisis and proximization. Kopytowska, M. W. Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism Across Space and Genres[M]. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017, 57-97.

Wittgenstein, L. J. J. Philosophiscal Investigation[M]. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2016.

Huang, Qiang. Discourse prejudice of American mainstream media on China’s national image: illustrated by the China-related reports during the outbreak of COVID-19[J]. Foreign Languages and Literature, 2021,37(4): 85-96.

Li, Linlin. Stigma in international relations: mechanisms of formation and case studies[D]. Gansu: Lanzhou University, 2021.

Li, Yaoqi, Song, Yaya, Liang, Siqi, Zhang, Xiaoming. Forming mechanism of occupational stigma of tour guides: an exploratory research based on grounding theory[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2022, 37(4): 79-92.

Wang, Cuimei. The stigmatization of China and its response: a perspective of frame theory J]. Foreign Affairs Review, 2022, 39(1): 124-148.

Zeng, Xianghong, Li, Linlin. The stigmatization of China by western countries against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. International Forum, 2020, 22(5): 117-135.

Zhang, Hui, Yang, Yanqin. Critical cognitive linguistics: theoretical foundations and its current research[J]. Foreign Language Education, 2019, 40(3): 1-11.

Zhao, Xiuzan, Yu, Li. Western stigma against China and China’s countermeasures in the context of 5G game[J]. Henan Social Sciences, 2022, 30(8): 63-70.

Zhu, Wanqi. An analysis of Japanese online media stigmatization against Chinese [D]. Hubei: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2019.

Downloads

Published

30 November 2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zang, C. (2023). Study on the Cognitive Mechanisms of Stigmatized Discourse Production in Western Media Based on Cognitive Attention. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 11(3), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i3.14450