Study on the Strategic Path Choice of Coal Industry in Shanxi Province under the Background of Double Carbon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i3.14919Keywords:
Cleaner production, Double carbon background, Extended industrial chain, Supporting policies, Technological innovation.Abstract
Under the current situation that the energy structure cannot be adjusted in the short term, promoting the clean and efficient use of coal is the core of solving the energy and environmental problems in Shanxi Province. Efforts to provide efficient, safe, low-carbon and economic energy is of strategic importance to ensure national energy security and ease the pressure on resources, environment, ecology and carbon emissions in the province. For Shanxi Province one is to analyze the gaps in the development of the province's coal industry in terms of capacity layout, scientific and technological innovation, clean utilization, and low-carbon development according to the new requirements of the low-carbon economy for the coal industry. Second is to build a modern coal industry system by expanding the coal industry chain, support the implementation of mergers and acquisitions of key enterprises in the province in the key links and core technologies of the industry chain to accelerate resource integration and enhance the value chain of the cluster industry. Third, improve the level of industrial openness. Work on four aspects of financial credit, fiscal and taxation, cross-border trade, and property rights system to create a low-carbon economic development highlands. Fourth, focus on attention to focus on the effective interface between the coal industry and the dual carbon economy, co-development, comprehensive consideration of energy consumption, pollutant emissions, carbon emissions, resource output efficiency and other factors, the development of thermal power, smelting and casting, chemical, cement and other industries to reduce carbon dioxide emissions action plan.
Downloads
References
Brauers, H., Oei, P. Y., & Walk, P. (2020). Comparing coal phase-out pathways: The United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 37, 238-253.
Chen Zhe. Research on the causal relationship between coal consumption and low-carbon economic development based on VECM model [J]. Coal Economic Research, 2021, 41 (03): 33-37.
Cui, R. Y., Hultman, N., Cui, D., McJeon, H., Yu, S., Edwards, M. R., ... & Zhu, M. (2021). A plant-by-plant strategy for high-ambition coal power phaseout in China. Nature communications, 12(1), 1468.
Dong Jiaxuan. Research on the Development Path of Shanxi's Coal Industry under the Background of Low Carbon Economy [J]. Coal, 2020, 29 (08): 91-93.
Gürtler, K., Beer, D. L., & Herberg, J. (2021). Scaling just transitions: Legitimation strategies in coal phase-out commissions in Canada and Germany. Political geography, 88, 102406.
Hu Yi, Jin Shuchang. Digital Technology Helps Achieve the "Double Carbon" Goal: Theoretical Mechanism and Practical Path [J]. Monthly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2022, (06): 111-118.
Joshua, U., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). The path to achieving environmental sustainability in South Africa: the role of coal consumption, economic expansion, pollutant emission, and total natural resources rent. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(9), 9435-9443.
Luo Lijun. Research on the model of coal economic ecosystem based on the perspective of low-carbon economy [J]. Inner Mongolia Coal Economy, 2022, (01): 60-62.
Li Xue. SWOT Analysis on the Development Strategy of Coal Enterprises in the Context of Low Carbon Economy [J]. Coal Technology, 2013, 32 (08): 15-17.
Li Xiaohua, Wang Yifan. The Evolution Mechanism of Future Industries and Industrial Policy Choices [J]. Reform, 2021 (02): 54-68.
Luo Tian. Industrial Synergistic Agglomeration and Low Carbon Development Model Shaping under the "Double Carbon" Target [J]. Ecological Economy, 2022, 38 (07): 42-47+71.
Ma Yan, Lu Jiang. Research on Low Carbon Economic Development Model of China's Coal Industry [J]. China Mining, 2011, 20 (05): 19-22.
Nisbet, E. G., Fisher, R. E., Lowry, D., France, J. L., Allen, G., Bakkaloglu, S., ... & Zazzeri, G. (2020). Methane mitigation: methods to reduce emissions, on the path to the Paris agreement. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(1), e2019RG000675.
Roemer, K. F., & Haggerty, J. H. (2022). The energy transition as fiscal rupture: Public services and resilience pathways in a coal company town. Energy Research & Social Science, 91, 102752.
Skoczkowski, T., Bielecki, S., Kochański, M., & Korczak, K. (2020). Climate-change induced uncertainties, risks and opportunities for the coal-based region of Silesia: Stakeholders' perspectives. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 460-481.
Tang Xiaowang. Research and Analysis on Preferential Policies of Enterprise Income Tax for Promoting the Development of Low Carbon Economy [J]. Tax Research, 2022, (04): 48-55.
Trencher, G., Rinscheid, A., Duygan, M., Truong, N., & Asuka, J. (2020). Revisiting carbon lock-in in energy systems: Explaining the perpetuation of coal power in Japan. Energy Research & Social Science, 69, 101770.
Weller, S., & Beer, A. (2023). State structures and the limits of agency: governing the transformation from coal in Australia. Regional Studies, 57(8), 1415-1427.
Wu Xiaoxia, Shi Chen, Gao Jian. Scientific connotation and mechanism innovation of high-quality development of resource-based economy [J]. Economic Issues, 2020 (12): 11-17.
Wyrwa, A., Suwała, W., Pluta, M., Raczyński, M., Zyśk, J., & Tokarski, S. (2022). A new approach for coupling the short-and long-term planning models to design a pathway to carbon neutrality in a coal-based power system. Energy, 239, 122438.
Zhao Jianfeng. Analysis and Policy Suggestions on Clean Utilization of Coal Industry from the Perspective of Low Carbon Economy [J]. Journal of Coal Industry, 2011, 36 (03): 514-518.
