Research on Ideological and Political Teaching of College English Course under the POA Theory

Jing Chen

doi:10.54097/ijeh.v11i3.15168

Authors

Jing Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i3.15168

Keywords:

POA theory; Ideological and political courses; College English.

Abstract

Promoting the ideological and political construction of college curriculum is the focus and direction of college education reform under the new situation. The curriculum characteristics of college English make it play an important role in the ideological and political construction of the curriculum. Based on the theory of POA, this paper integrates the ideological and political elements of curriculum into the whole process of classroom teaching such as motivating, enabling and assessing, aiming to explore the feasible paths and methods for integrating ideological and political education into college English teaching.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

The College English Teaching Guide of the University Foreign Language Teaching Steering Committee of the Ministry of Education (2020 edition) [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2020.

Lan Jie. Example analysis of college English course design based on output-oriented method under the background of "Curriculum Politics" [J]. Yinshan Journal, 2021,34 (02): 100-106.

Pan Yuli. Ideological and political teaching practice of College English under the theory of "output-oriented method" [J]. Journal of Pu'er College, 2021(03):118-119.

Hu Jiehui. Research on teaching design from the Ideological and Political Perspective of Foreign Language Curriculum [J]. Chinese foreign language,

Wen Qiufang. Construct the theoretical system of "output-oriented method" [J]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2015 (04): 547-558.

Wen Qiufang. The Chinese characteristics of the "output-oriented method" [M]. Modern Foreign Languages, 2017 (03): 348-357.

Sun Shuguang. Output-oriented Method: Exploration of Foreign Language Education Theory Innovation in China [J]. Frontier of Foreign Language Education Research, 2021,4 (2): 81-84.