Advocacy for Design Education: Shifting from Traditional Design Paradigms to Human-centred Social Design

Authors

  • Meng Cao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/43b3ba60

Keywords:

Design education, Human-centred, User-centred, Social design, Interdisciplinary.

Abstract

This study examines the gradual evolution from traditional design paradigms to today's socially orientated design in the field of traditional design education. Traditional types of design exist in numerous industries, such as architecture, interior, apparel, and graphic design. However, much of the past design paradigm has been practically orientated. In contrast, the design industry and its processes are slowly becoming more socially relevant. After all, the advancement of society requires a greater consideration of the needs of the user. Therefore, there is a huge challenge in the transition to social design. From the perspective of design education, the most fundamental problem can be solved by implanting the traditional concept of design education into the concept of human-centred design. This study not only provides an in-depth theoretical and case study for the transformation of design education but also provides an outlook on the trend of this path in future research on human-centred social design education. This research supports the development of more creative and socially responsible designers in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nelson, H.G. and Stolterman, E. 2012. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable. World Second edition. MIT Press.

Papanek, V.J. 1972. Design for the real world. London: Thames & Hudson.

James-Chakraborty, K. 2012. Review: Bauhaus Dream-house: Modernity and Globalization , by Katerina Rüedi Ray. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 71(3), pp.422–423.

Howaldt, J. and Schwarz, M. 2017. Social Innovation and Human Development-How the. Capabilities Approach and Social Innovation Theory Mutually Support Each Other. Journal of human development and capabilities. 18(2), pp.163–180.

Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, Julie. and Mulgan, Geoff. 2010. The open book of social innovation. Great Britain: NESTA.

Mouchrek, N. and Krucken, L. 2020. Design as an agent of change: Practice-oriented. initiatives on Design Teaching. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación. (80), pp.123–138.

Souleles, N. 2017. Design for social change and design education: Social challenges versus. teacher-centred pedagogies. The Design journal. 20(1), pp.S927–S936.

Raizman, D.Seth. 2010. History of modern design : graphics and products since the industrial. revolution. Second edition / David Raizman. London: Laurence King.

Ronald L. M. The Center for Universal Design. [Online]. 1997. [Accessed 23 October 2023]. Available from: https://design.ncsu.edu/research/center-for-universal-design/

Garrett, J.James. 2011. The elements of user experience : user-centered design for the Web and. beyond Second edition. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.

Yuan, Y. 2022. The Role of Research-Based User-Centred Signage Graphic Design in Improving. the Effectiveness of the Wayfinding Signage System in Academic Settings for Partially Sighted Individuals.

Thiger, E., Woxblom, L. and Roos, A. 2017. Empathic design for wood product innovation. based on genuine customer needs - A test application on Swedish builders. Wood Material Science & Engineering. 12(3), pp.118–128.

Simlinger, P. 2019. Visual communication design: Caught between two stools. Information. Design Journal : IDJ. 25(3), pp.314–324.

Pérez, D., Hands, D., McKeever, E. and Whitham, R. 2019. Design within Social. Entrepreneurship. A Framework to reveal the use of Design in interdisciplinary spaces. The Design journal. 22(S1), pp.229–241.

Kurosu, Masaaki. (ed.). 2011. Human Centered Design : Second International Conference, HCD 2011, Held as Part of HCI International 2011, Orlando, FL, USA, July 9-14, 2011, Proceedings 1st ed. 2011. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

Papanek, V.J. 1995. The green imperative : ecology and ethics in design and architecture. London: Thames and Hudson.

Papanek, V.J. 1983. Design for human scale. New York ; Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Tromp, N., Hekkert, P. and Verbeek, P.-P. 2011. Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A. Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience. Design issues. 27(3), pp.3–19.

Anon 2010. BOOKS: White Kenya Hara. London: Centaur Communications Limited.

Kuriakose, B., Shrestha, R. and Sandnes, F.E. 2022. Tools and Technologies for Blind and. Visually Impaired Navigation Support: A Review. Technical review - IETE. 39(1), pp.3–18.

Helen, W. 2013. Buildings made from cardboard tubes: A gallery of Shigeru Ban. architecture. [Online]. [Accessed 3 January 2024]. Available from: https://blog.ted.com/buildings-made-from-cardboard-tubes-a-gallery-of-shigeru-ban-architecture/

Downloads

Published

1 February 2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cao, M. (2024). Advocacy for Design Education: Shifting from Traditional Design Paradigms to Human-centred Social Design. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 12(2), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.54097/43b3ba60