Teaching For Art Criticism: Application of Feldman’s ‘Method of Art Criticism’ to Students' Expressive Ink Figure Paintings

Authors

  • Ruohan Liang
  • Elis Syuhaila binti Mokhtar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fv2k8m75

Keywords:

Feldman, Art Criticism, Expressive Painting, Ink Figure Paintings, Critical Analysis.

Abstract

This study collected artworks from 30 first-year art education students and conducted critical analysis using Feldman’s ‘Method of Art Criticism’. Visual data were analyzed quantitatively; descriptive statistical techniques were used. Scores are viewed as mean scores and frequencies to determine how students' critical abilities are reflected. Use the Pearson correlation coefficient to find correlations between students' expressive ink figure drawings and art critical ability scores. Research indicates, Most students performed slightly better than average in critical analysis and performed best in selected analysis among the four areas of assessment (Description, Analysis, Interpretation, Judgment). In the context of students' expressive ink figure drawing and critical skills, the findings indicate that there is a certain connection between students' art critical skills and expressive ink figure drawing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tollifson, J. (1990). Tips on teaching art criticism. NAEA advisory. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

Johnson, M. H., & Cooper, S. L. (1994). Developing a system for assessing written art criticism. Art Education. 47(5), 21-26. doi: 10.2307/3193498

Eisner, E. W. (1988).The role of discipline based art education in America's schools. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Centre for Education in the Arts.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. F. (1990). The art of seeing: An interpretation of the aesthetic encounter. Malibu: J. Paul Getty Museum and Getty Centre for Education in the Arts.

Subramaniam, M., Hanafi, J., & Talib, A. (2016). Teaching For Art Criticism: Incorporating Feldman’s Critical Analysis Learning Model in Students’ Studio Practice. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. 4(1), 57-67.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood. New York: John Wiley&Sons.

Sullivan, G. (2009). Art Practice as Research inquiry in Visual Art. SAGE Publications Pvt. Ltd.

Feldman, E.B. (1994). Practical art criticism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Gao, M. l (2021). History of Chinese Contemporary Art. Shanghai: University Press.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Zheng Xinyan. A brief analysis of the evolution and movement of the modernization of Chinese art [J]. Beauty and Times, 2015 (27): 110.

Liu Jia. Looking at experimental ink in the 1990s from the perspective of art history and spiritual history [J]. Contemporary Experimental Ink, 2016 (13): 277.

Huang Hui. On Chinese experimental ink painting in the 1990s [J]. Lion Art, 2015, (07): 155-157.

Creswell,J.W.(2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Downloads

Published

01-02-2024

Issue

Section

Articles