Topic Mining and Evolution of U.S. Mainstream Media Reporting on “Belt and Road Initiative” (2013-2023)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/thgp9t89Keywords:
“Belt and Road Initiative”, Topic Mining, Topic EvolutionAbstract
The year 2023 marks the 10th anniversary of the the Belt and Road Initiative. A comprehensive analysis and evaluation of mainstream media reports in the United States offer valuable insights into the overall understanding and strategic trends of the United States over the past decade. Such insights hold significant importance for shaping the future development of the Belt and Road Initiative. This study utilizes Factiva’s extensive self-compiled “Belt and Road Initiative” news corpus, employing social network analysis, multiple correspondence analysis, and co-occurrence network analysis to visualize the topic distribution and evolution in American media reports on Belt and Road Initiative. The identified topics in American “Belt and Road Initiative” reports encompass transportation, finance and trade, diplomacy and politics, science and technology, ecological environment, and medical care and health. From a diachronic perspective, the evolution of US “B&R” reporting unfolds in three distinct stages. The period from 2013 to 2015 is characterized by a focus on macro-policy reports, shifting to economic and technological reports from 2016 to 2019. The subsequent stage, spanning 2020 to 2023, centers on ecological sustainability and debt reporting. Furthermore, this study observes that the content of US “B&R” reports exhibits a pronounced political nature, gradually leaning towards characterizing Belt and Road Initiative as China’s geostrategic layout for developing countries.
Downloads
References
Chen, J., & Wang, L. (2020). Discourse Analysis of Belt and Road Reports in China Daily from the Perspective of National Image Construction. Media, (19), 78-81.
Ding, L., & Liu, Z. (2021). Analysis of Belt and Road Initiative Discourse in Typical American and British Think Tanks: A Corpus-based Perspective. Journal of Intelligence, (06), 102-110+81.
Fang, G. (2018). Comparative Analysis of Domestic and International Communication Effects of the Belt and Road Initiative: Based on Corpus Media Discourse Analysis. Media, (01), 70-73.
Han, J. & Shu, M. (2021). Comparison of Mainstream Cognitive Differences between Europe and the Middle East on the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of International Relations, (05), 136-153+158-159.
Hu, K., & Chen, C. (2018). The Reception of the English Translations of Chinese Diplomatic Terms in Britain, USA and India-with the English Translation of Yidai Yilu as a Case in Point. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (02), 43-50.
Li, L., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Analysis of the Reporting Trends on the Belt and Road by British Media. Journalism Lover, (07), 19-23.
Li, X., & Xuan, C. (2022). An Analysis of the Emotional Valence of English News Reports on the One Belt & One Road Initiative: A Co-constructive Perspective of Space and Technology. Journalism Research, (06), 62-74+121-122.
Liu, M. (2020). An Investigation into Changes in Major Japanese Newspapers’ Cognization of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education. (05), 108-113+16.
Qi, R., & Fu, H. (2022). Topic Mining and Evolution of “Belt and Road Initiative” Report in Think Tanks. Think Tank: Theory & Practice, (05), 11-19.
Wang, S., & Chen, R. (2022). A structural topic modeling of international academic discourse on the Belt and Road Initiative: Topics, trends and differences. Foreign Language Education, (04), 8-14.
Wang, X. (2021).An Analysis of American Think Tanks’ Cognition of the Belt and Road Initiative in the Past Eight Years. Think Tank:Theory & Practice, (06), 102-109.
Wang, X., & Hu, K. (2023). Dissemination and reception of the English translations of “gaige kaifang” in US and UK news media. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, (04), 84-98.
Zhan, M. (2018). The German Think Tanks’ Perceptions of the Belt and Road Initiative. Foreign Language Research, (06), 7-12.
Zhang, Y., & Yi, D. (2022). A Comparative Study of the Metaphors of the Belt and Road Initiative in British and American Mainstream Media Coverage. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (04), 58-64+117.
Zhang, Y., Wang, H., & Li W. (2022). How American and Indian Think Tanks Report on Belt and Road Initiative. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (01), 63-69+110.
Zhong, X. (2018). A Study on the Construction of Meaning in the Discourse of Belt and Road in British National Newspapers—Based on Corpus Critical Discourse Analysis. Modern Communication(Journal of Communication University of China), (07), 61-69.
Zhu, G., & Huang, J. (2016). China’s Belt and Road Strategy in the Perspective of U.S. Mainstream Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis Based on Relevant Reports from The Washington Post. Journalism and Mass Communication, (17), 58-64.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







