Cultivating Academic Innovation Talents in Universities: The Impact of “Up-Or-Out” Employment System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/nnmfwv92Keywords:
Up-Or-Out, Innovative Talents, University Appointment System, Career AnxietyAbstract
The “up-or-out” system is an employment model widely practiced in universities. It involves the establishment of postdoctoral or full-time research positions, regular evaluations of non-permanent faculty, and the selection of outstanding innovative talents. Originating from the innovative practices of the American university tenure system, this model provides incentives for scientific spirit and academic innovation, complementing the tenure track. However, this system presents challenges in practice, such as survival pressure for new teachers, career anxiety, re-employment difficulties, and impacts on the long-term development of innovation capabilities. Solutions lie in innovating the evaluation models, emphasizing humanistic care, and fully respecting teachers’ rights. The system should serve as a means to enhance academic competitiveness rather than undermine the dignity of educators. Only in this way can the “up-or-out” system truly play a positive role in promoting academic progress and innovation.
Downloads
References
J. Ye, X. Zhu and L. N. Lo: Reform of Teacher Education in China: A Survey of Policies for Systemic Change, Teachers and Teaching, Vol. 25 (2019) No. 7, p. 757-781.
M. Lai, P. Du and L. N. Lo: Restricted Opportunities under Employment Reform: The Experiences of Select Universities in the Chinese Mainland, Higher Education Research & Development, Vol. 35 (2016) No. 3, p. 516-530.
M. Teng: Understanding Identity Tension from the Identity-in-Discourse Framework: Early-Career Academics in Applied Linguistics in China, Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, Vol. 12 (2024) No. 1, p. 149-168.
S. Y. Wang and R. Yao: The Global Diffusion and Diverse Forms of Academic Tenure Reform, Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition), Vol. 26 (2024) No. 3, p. 51-60.
Y. Chen: Making the Academic Path More Attractive: A Study on the Reform of the Academic Reserve Talent System in Germany, Comparative Education Review, Vol. 44 (2022) No. 3, p. 61-68.
S. Wang and G. A. Jones: Competing Institutional Logics of Academic Personnel System Reforms in Leading Chinese Universities, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 43 (2021) No. 1, p. 49-66.
L. Liu and Z. M. Liu: The Transformation of Government-University Relations: Experiences from Finland, Sweden, and Belgium in Building World-Class Universities, Foreign Education Research, Vol. 44 (2017) No. 9, p. 13-25.
J. Li, Y. Hu and Y. B. Yang: The Controversy and Improvement of the Tenure System in the United States: Reflections on the “Pre-Appointment and Tenure System” in China, Research in Educational Development, Vol. 43 (2023) No. 19, p. 61-67.
X. Xia, B. Huang and C. Liu: Reforming the Employment System of Teachers in Universities: Exploring the Current Situation and Difficulties under the “Up-or-Out” Policy, Journal of Education Research, Vol. 1 (2022) No. 5, p. 343-347.
Z. Liu, J. Wang and Q. Zhang: “We Know Who We Are”: Segmentation and Characterization of the Academic Community toward Classified Faculty Evaluation Reform in a Chinese Non-Research University, Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol. 1 (2023), p. 1-13.
G. Yan, Y. Yue and M. Niu: An Empirical Study of Faculty Mobility in China, Higher Education, Vol. 69 (2015), p. 527-546.
S. Y. Wang: A Study on the Development of Academic Careers in Finland under the Background of Tenure Track Reform, Comparative Education Review, Vol. 43 (2021) No. 5, p. 21-28.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Education and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
