Comparative Study of Chinese Translations of “Gitanjali” based on Natural Language Processing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/czjbth38Keywords:
Translation Studies, Gitanjali, Chinese Translations, Comparative Analysis, Natural Language Processing, HanLPAbstract
This paper employs the HanLP natural language processing model to conduct a quantitative text analysis of four Chinese translations of “Gitanjali”. The analysis examines text features such as character and sentence count, lexical properties, lexical density, and high-frequency words. The results indicate that, except for Wu Yan’s translation, the text features of the other translations are relatively similar in terms of data distribution. Wu Yan’s translation has higher character and sentence count, and usage of lexical properties than the other translations, but it has the lowest lexical density, indicating a lower information density. The study also reveals that the choice of lexical properties and high-frequency words in each translation is influenced by the translator’s personal language preferences. Although the types of high-frequency words are relatively fixed, their frequencies vary significantly. Based on these findings, the study further uncovers the intrinsic logic and structural relationships among different text features, offering significant insights for the study of specific literary and translation texts, as well as broader translation and linguistic research. This paper demonstrates the effectiveness of HanLP in literary and translation research, highlighting the potential of natural language processing models in large-scale text analysis.
Downloads
References
[1] Yang, J. (2017). The key promoter of Tagore’s Nobel Prize in Literature. Literature and History World, (06), 74-79.
[2] Zeng, Q. (2012). Tagore in world literature: The translation and research of “Gitanjali”. Foreign Language Teaching, (04), 82-85.
[3] Liang, F. (2016). Following the beautiful footsteps of translators: A comparative study of Chinese translations of “Gitanjali”. Journal of Harbin University, (08), 81-86.
[4] Liu, J. C., & Ren, X. F. (2018). Corpus-based Comparative Study on Chinese Versions of Gitanjali-A Case Study on Bingxin’s and Bai Kaiyuan’s Versions. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 8(1), 37-42.
[5] Hu, X. (2007). A corpus-based study on the lexical features of Chinese translated novels. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (03), 214-220+241.
[6] Tagore, R. (2008). Gitanjali (Bing Xin, Trans.). Yilin Translation Publishing House. (Original work published 1912).
[7] Tagore, R. (1990). Gitanjali (Wu Yan, Trans.). Shanghai Translation Publishing House. (Original work published 1912).
[8] Tagore, R. (2010). Gitanjali (Shen Huan & Wang Li, Trans.). China Pictorial Publishing House. (Original work published 1912).
[9] Tagore, R. (2019). Gitanjali (Xiao Xingzheng, Trans.). Yunnan people’s Publishing House. (Original work published 1912).
[10] Baruah, M. (2014). Translation Theories and Translating Assamese Texts. Translation Today, 5, 8(2), 5-30.
[11] Baker, M. (1995). Corpora in translation studies: An overview and some suggestions for future research. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies, 7(2), 223-243.
[12] Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2000). Longman grammar of spoken and written English.
[13] Hu, X., & Zeng, J. (2009). A corpus-based study on the grammatical markers explicitation in translated novels. Foreign Language Research, (05), 72-79.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







