Corpus-Based Behavioral Profile Study of English Synonyms: Amazing, Astonishing, Stunning, Surprising, Startling, Staggering, and Shocking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/g79myk03Keywords:
Behavioral Profile, Near-Synonym, Distributional Pattern, Internal Semantic Structure, British National Corpus (BNC)Abstract
Employing the British National Corpus (BNC) as the source data and #LancsBox X as the tool, this study adopted a corpus-based behavioural profile approach to examine seven adjective near-synonyms (amazing, astonishing, stunning, surprising, startling, staggering, and shocking), focusing on the typical types of nouns they each modify and their register distribution patterns. The results showed that although these adjectives share a central meaning, they differ in usage patterns and formality levels, which complements the current inadequacies in describing these adjectives. Moreover, the study has confirmed the theory and applicability of the BP approach for investigating the semantic and usage patterns of synonyms in a set.
Downloads
References
[1] Bolinger, D. L. (1968). Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa, 2, 119–127.
[2] Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical guide. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/131100/
[3] Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press.
[4] Cruse, D. A. (2000). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
[5] Church, K. W., Gale, W., Hanks, P., & Hindle, D. (1991). Using statistics in lexical analysis. In U. Zernik (Ed.), Lexical acquisition: Exploiting on-line resources to build a lexicon (pp. 115–164). Lawrence Erlbaum.
[6] Church, K. W., Gale, W., Hanks, P., Hindle, D., & Moon, R. (1994). Lexical substitutability. In B. T. S. Atkins & A. Zampolli (Eds.), Computational approaches to the lexicon (pp. 153–177). Oxford University Press.
[7] DiMarco, C., Hirst, G., & Stede, M. (1993). The semantic and stylistic differentiation of synonyms and near-synonyms. In Building lexicons for machine translation volume. AAAI.
[8] Divjak, D. (2006). Ways of intending: Delineating and structuring near-synonyms. In De Gruyter eBooks (pp. 19–56). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197709.19
[9] Divjak, D., & Gries, S. T. (2006). Ways of trying in Russian: Clustering behavioral profiles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2006.002
[10] Divjak, D. (2010). Structuring the lexicon: A clustered model for near-synonymy. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB04508631
[11] De Saussure, F. (2011). Course in General Linguistics. Columbia University Press.
[12] Edmonds, P., & Hirst, G. (2002). Near-Synonymy and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics, 28(2), 105–144. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120102760173625
[13] Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–55. In F. R. Palmer (Ed.), Selected papers of J. R. Firth 1952–59. Longmans. (Original work published 1957)
[14] Gries, S. Th. (2001). A corpus-linguistic analysis of English -ic vs -ical adjectives. ICAME Journal, 25, 65–108.
[15] Gries, S. Th. (2010). Behavioral profiles: A fine-grained and quantitative approach in corpus-based lexical semantics. The Mental Lexicon, 5(3), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.5.3.04gri
[16] Gries, S. T., & Otani, N. (2010). Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based perspective on synonymy and antonymy. ICAME Journal, 34, 121–150.
[17] Halliday, M. A. K. (1966). Lexis as a linguistic level. In C. Bazell, J. Catford, M. Halliday, & R. Robins (Eds.), In memory of J. R. Firth (pp. 148–162). Longman.
[18] Harris, Z. S. (1970). Papers in Structural and Transformational Linguistics. In Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6059-1
[19] Hanks, P. (1996). Contextual dependency and lexical sets. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 1(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.1.1.06han
[20] Kaunisto, M. (1999). Electric/electrical and classic/classical: Variation between the suffixes -ic and -ical. English Studies, 4, 343–370.
[21] Liu, D. (2010). Is it a chief, main, major, primary, or principal concern? International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.1.03liu
[22] Saussure, F. de. (1983). Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). G. Duckworth. (Original work published 1916)
[23] Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.
[24] Stefanowitsch, A. (2020). Corpus linguistics: A guide to the methodology. Language Science Press.
[25] Taylor, J. R. (2002). Near synonyms as co-extensive categories: ‘high’ and ‘tall’ revisited. Language Sciences, 25(3), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0388-0001(02)00018-9
[26] Walker, C. (2011). How a corpus-based study of the factors which influence collocation can help in the teaching of business English. English for Specific Purposes, 30(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.12.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Education and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
