Problem Analysis and Improvement Strategies in the Design of Pre-writing Question Frame for Junior High School English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/r5q6gx60Keywords:
Writing Teaching, Pre-writing Activities, Question Design, Question ScaffoldingAbstract
The design of pre-writing question frame is an important part of writing teaching design. However, there are some problems in the design of pre-writing question frame at this stage, such as ignoring the individual differences between students, low level of question thinking, no connection with students’ actual life, no match with students' language ability, and the questions are not specific enough. This paper puts forward corresponding improvement strategies for the problems existing in the design of pre-writing question support, aiming at improving the appropriateness of pre-writing question support, making pre-writing activities more adequate and effective, and improving the effectiveness of writing teaching des ign.
Downloads
References
[1] Adubato,S.2005.Make the Connection:Improve Your Communication at Work and at Home[M].New Jersey:Rutgers University Press.
[2] Dougherty,E.,Billings,L.&Roberts,T.2016.The Better Writing Breakthrough:Connecting Student Thinking and Discussion to Inspire Great Writing[M].Alexandria:Association for Supervision&Curriculum Development.
[3] Fusco,E.2012.Effective Questioning Strategies in the Classroom:A Step-by-Step Approach to Engaged Thinking and Learning,K-8[M].New York:Teachers College Press.
[4] Pagliaro,M.2017.Questioning,Instructional Strategies,and Classroom Management:A Compendium of Criteria for Best Teaching Practices[M].Maryland:The Rowman&Littlefield Publishing Group.
[5] Walsh,J.A.&Sattes,B.D.2015.Questioning for Classroom Discussion:Purposeful Speaking,Engaged Listening,Deep Thinking[M].Alexandria:Association for Supervision&Curriculum Development.
[6] Alderson, J. C., E-L. Haapakangas, A. Huhta, L. Nieminen & R. Ullakonoja. 2015. The Diagnosis of Reading in a Second or Foreign Language[M]. New York: Routledge.
[7] Alderson, J.C.2005.Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency: The Interface Between Learning and Assessment[M]. London: Continuum.
[8] Bachman L F & Palmer A S. 2010. Language Assessment in Practice: Developing Language Assessments and Justifying Their Use in the Real World [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[9] Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B & Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 [J]. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1):1-48.
[10] Butler D L & Winne P H. 1995. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis [J]. Review of Educational Research ,65(3):245-281.
[11] Carless D & Boud D. 2018. The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback [J]. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education ,43(8):1315-1325.
[12] Chong S W. 2021. Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective [J]. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1):92-104.
[13] Daniels L M & Bulut O. 2020. Students' perceived usefulness of computerized percentage-only vs. descriptive score reports: Associations with motivation and grades [J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning ,36(2):199-208.
[14] Dela Torre, J. 2011. The generalized DINA model framework[J]. Psychometrika, (2):179-199.
[15] Doe, C.2015.Student interpretations of diagnostic feedback[J]. Language Assessment Quarterly 12:110-135.
[16] Effatpanah, F., Baghaei, P.A. & A. Boori. 2019. Diagnosing EFL learners’ writing ability: A diagnostic classification modeling analysis[J]. Language Testing in Asia, (9):12-35.
[17] Fan T, Song J & Guan Z. 2021. Integrating diagnostic assessment into curriculum: A theoretical framework and teaching practices [J]. Language Testing in Asia,11.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Education and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
