Exploring the Core Common Principles in the Practical Cultivation of Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism

Authors

  • Danju Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/5kv61z83

Keywords:

Cultural Integration, Buddhism in China, Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism, Respect for Life, Moral Cultivation

Abstract

When any culture is first introduced to a foreign country, friction and conflict inevitably arise due to differences in national character, political ethics, religious beliefs, customs, and habits. In order to reduce such conflicts, the introducers of the culture must find common ground between the two, facilitating its acceptance and development. Buddhism is no exception. When Buddhism was first introduced to China at the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty, it was introduced in the form of Taoist practices. During the Wei and Jin dynasties, with the rise of metaphysical thought, Buddhism further aligned itself with metaphysics. In order to survive, Buddhism continuously sought to reconcile its teachings with traditional Chinese culture. As Buddhism took root in China, debates regarding the merits and shortcomings of Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism emerged. Scholars studying the similarities and differences between these three schools gradually increased, and it became widely acknowledged that Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism had many areas of overlap and integration. This paper mainly analyzes the commonalities of the three teachings in aspects such as "detachment from form," "respect for life and cherishing life," and "moral cultivation," emphasizing their similarities in views on life, morality, and the relationship between humans and nature. The research method employed is textual analysis, comparing the classic teachings of the three schools to reveal their similarities and differences in philosophical thought and ethics. The results show that Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism share significant commonalities in their respect for life, emphasis on moral cultivation, and advocacy for the harmonious coexistence between humans and nature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Jiang, Yi-Huah. "Confucian political theory in contemporary China." Annual Review of Political Science 21, no. 1 (2018): 155-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041916-020230

[2] Hahm, Chaihark. "Ritual and Constitutionalism: Disputing the Ruler's Legitimacy in a Confucian Polity." The American Journal of Comparative Law 57, no. 1 (2009): 135-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2008.0005

[3] San, Chan Khoon. "Buddhism Course." Taman Petaling: Chan Khoon San (2006).

[4] Alam, Mohammad Jahangir. "A Harmonious Synthesis of Taoism, Confucianism and Buddhism in the Matrix of Chinese Culture: An Overview." Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Humanities 68, no. 2 (2023): 207-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jasbh.v68i2.70364

[5] Li, Yaming. "The Confucian concept of human dignity and its implications for bioethics." Developing World Bioethics 22, no. 1 (2022): 23-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12312

[6] McCarthy, Susan K. "Spiritual technologies and the politics of Buddhist charity." Buddhism after Mao: Negotiations, continuities, and reinventions (2019): 77-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv7r42g9.7

[7] You, Zhuran, A. G. Rud, Yingzi Hu, Zhuran You, A. G. Rud, and Yingzi Hu. "Promoting Morality for Ultimate Liberation: The Philosophy of Moral Education in Religious Taoism and Buddhism." The Philosophy of Chinese Moral Education: A History (2018): 133-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56434-4_7

[8] Tang, Yijie. Confucianism, Buddhism, Daoism, Christianity and Chinese Culture. Springer, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45533-3

Downloads

Published

14 March 2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, D. (2025). Exploring the Core Common Principles in the Practical Cultivation of Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 18(3), 178-180. https://doi.org/10.54097/5kv61z83