Study on the Possible Application of Value-added Evaluation in Chinese Higher Education

Authors

  • Yize Dong
  • Jingzhu Luo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/t0paqg88

Keywords:

Value-added Evaluation, Education Evaluation Reform, Higher Education

Abstract

As China's higher education enters a new stage with high-quality development, the traditional result-oriented evaluation system can no longer fully reflect the true contribution of the teaching process. However, value-added evaluation, as a new evaluation concept that focuses on students’ growth and net educational contribution, provides a new path for quality governance of higher education. This paper focuses on the possible application of value-added evaluation in Chinese universities, which starting from the theoretical foundations of educational philosophy, outcome-based education and developmental evaluation theory, it constructs a "input-process-output" ternary structure and a "vertical-horizontal" two-dimensional analysis model. This paper systematically analyzes the realistic basis for Chinese universities to introduce value-added evaluation in terms of policy promotion, data support, teaching culture and institutional environment, proposes a multi-level and multi-path application strategy, and points out the multiple challenges in the implementation process, such as data, concepts, technology and resource fairness. This paper emphasizes that only under the coordinated promotion of concept guidance, mechanism construction and localization strategy, can value-added evaluation be realized from concept to educational practice, and help Chinese universities achieve quality leap and governance transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council issued the “Overall Plan for Deepening Education Evaluation Reform in the New Era” [EB/OL] (2020-10-13) (2025-05-25) https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm.

[2] Koedel C, Rockoff J. Value-added modeling: A review. Economics of Education Review. 2015, Vol. 47, p180-195.

[3] Darling-Hammond L. "Can value added add value to teacher evaluation?." Educational Researcher,2015, Vol. 44 (No. 2),p132-137.

[4] Rao N. "Outcome-based education: An outline." Higher Education for the Future.2020.Vol7 (No. 1), p5-21.

[5] Shabani K, Khatib M, Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers' professional development. English language teaching. 2010, Vol. 3(No. 3), p237-248.

[6] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. Notice of the Ministry of Education on Issuing the “Education Informatization 2.0 Action Plan”. [EB/OL] (2018-04-18) (2025-05-25) http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201804/t20180425_334188.html.

[7] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. Notice of the Ministry of Education on Issuing the Implementation Plan for the Review and Evaluation of Undergraduate Education and Teaching in Regular Institutions of Higher Education (2021-2025). [EB/OL] (2021-02-03) (2025-05-25) http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A11/s7057/202102/t20210205_512709.html.

[8] Liu O. Value-added assessment in higher education: A comparison of two methods. Higher Education.2011, Vol. 61, p445-461.

[9] Yu X. A Study on the Impact of Learning Environment on Higher Vocational College Students in Shandong Province, China: A Value-added Assessment Perspective. Journal of Interdisciplinary Insights. 2024, Vol. 2(NO. 2), P33-45.

Downloads

Published

4 July 2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Dong, Y., & Luo, J. (2025). Study on the Possible Application of Value-added Evaluation in Chinese Higher Education. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 20(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.54097/t0paqg88