The Practice of the "Three-Stages and Four-Dimensions" Curriculum-Based Political and Ideological Education Model in the Teaching of "Computer Networking" Course

Authors

  • Yadong Gong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/5vw5xp16

Keywords:

Curriculum-based Ideological and Political Education, Computer Networking, Third-Stages and Four-Dimensions, Outcome-Based Education

Abstract

In the context of the nationwide implementation of "curriculum-based ideological and political education" and the construction of "Emerging Engineering Education", the seamless integration of ideological and political cultivation into technically oriented courses, such as Computer Networking, has become a pivotal issue in higher education reform. The prevailing problems of "technique-heavy yet value-light" instruction and the superficial "ideological label-sticking" phenomenon are targeted in this paper, which proposes a "Three-stages and Four-dimensions" model of curriculum-based ideological and political education. The model systematically excavates advanced ideological elements embedded in the Computer Networking curriculum and constructs a closed pedagogical loop of "pre-class value arousal - in-class symbiotic inquiry - post-class reflective transfer”, covering the four dimensions: (1) National Sentiment, (2) Ethics and the Rule of Law, (3) Scientific Spirit, and (4) Global Vision. The instructional effectiveness was quantitatively evaluated through the implementation of an OBE-based achievement assessment instrument. Empirical evidence has demonstrated that the proposed model significantly enhances students’ value identification and professional competence. It offers a replicable and scalable pathway for the systematic design and assessment of ideological and political education in emerging engineering courses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Turns, J., Sattler, B., & Kilgore, D. (2023). “Educating for Sociotechnical Responsibility: A Review of Engineering Education Reform.” Journal of Engineering Education, 112(2), 237-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20492.

[2] Litzinger, T., Wise, J., & Lee, S. H. (2022). “Outcome-Based Assessment of Ethical Reasoning in Engineering Courses.” European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(5), 689-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2035685.

[3] Zandvoort, H., Borsen, T., & Deneke, M. (2021). “Embedding Ethics in the Computing Curriculum: A Systematic Model.” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 21(3), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3453156.

[4] Kolmos, A., & de Graaff, E. (2022). “Problem-Based Learning and Moral Competence in Engineering: A Comparative Study.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 1021-1032. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijee.2022.4.1021.

[5] Campbell, R., & Lee, J. (2020). “Using Mixed Methods to Evaluate Value-Laden Learning Outcomes in Computing Education.” Computer Science Education, 30(4), 353-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1829601.

Downloads

Published

14 November 2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Gong, Y. (2025). The Practice of the "Three-Stages and Four-Dimensions" Curriculum-Based Political and Ideological Education Model in the Teaching of "Computer Networking" Course. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 21(2), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.54097/5vw5xp16