Research on English Vocabulary Continuity between High School and University from the Perspective of Language Attrition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/pszj5b62Keywords:
Language Attrition, Vocabulary, Continuity, Education, MethodAbstract
The transition from high-school to university vocabulary learning is a decisive phase in English proficiency development, yet the two systems are rarely aligned. Differences in goals, content and learning culture create a sharp discontinuity, freshmen often regress, losing words faster than they acquire new ones. Viewing this attrition as reversible, the paper draws on language-erosion research to design bridging instruction. Empirical studies at home and abroad point to five practical measures: concise explicit teaching, multimodal input, contextualized practice, deep processing of high-frequency words, and sustained motivation to enhance students’ autonomy. This study provides teachers with transitional teaching suggestions from the perspective of students, and sets clear requirements for themselves to promote a smooth transition in college English learning and assist in the sustainable development of language abilities in the future.
Downloads
References
[1] Barcroft J. Lexical elaboration and vocabulary attrition: The role of semantic mapping[J]. Language Teaching Research, 2021, 25(6): 912-932.
[2] Hansen L. Second Language Attrition Japanese Contexts[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
[3] Jewitt, C. Multimodality and digital technologies: New directions for language learning. Journal of Language and Education, 2023, 9(2), 123-138.
[4] Richard M. Ryan, & Edward L. Deci. Self - Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness[M]. New York: Guilford Publications, 2017.
[5] Stein, P. Multimodal pedagogies in diverse classrooms: Representation, rights and resources[J]. Language and Education, 2000, 14(2), 121-135.
[6] He Xiaomin. Differences and Recommendations in the Transition Between High School and University English Teaching [J]. Educational Teaching Forum, 2013(19): 93-94
[7] Jin Yan. Analysis of Language Attrition in English [J].Journal of Chuzhou University, 2014, 16(4): 90-92.
[8] Lin Dongmei, Li Zhitao. Commentary on the Characteristics of Language Attrition and Its Implications [J]. Journal of Yangtze Normal University, 2016, 32(05): 128-132,144.
[9] Ni Chanbin. Research on the Influencing Factors of Foreign Language Attrition[M]. Shanghai: the Publishing House of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2018.
[10] .Ni Chanbin, Yan Junrong. Analysis of the influencing factors of foreign language attrition [J]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2006, 38(1): 50-55.
[11] Wang Xiangyun. Discussion on the Mechanism and Pattern of Language Attrition [J]. Journal of Shandong University, 2011(2): 133-138.
[12] Xue Fangfang. Literature Review of Language Attrition Theory Research [J]. Data of Culture and Education, 2018, (6): 39-40,58.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







