Effects of Generative AI on Students' Cognitive Engagement from a Multimodal Learning Perspective

Authors

  • Zihan Yuan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/j9rd2b76

Keywords:

Generative AI, Cognitive Engagement, Multimodal Learning, Cognitive Load, Large Language Models, Educational Technology, Self-Regulated Learning

Abstract

The wide spread use of generative AIs in teaching may raise questions about whether, via technology itself, we might be able to foster even greater interest among students. Based on the above-mentioned theories including Mayer's theory of cognitively structured media in multimedia learning, Fredricks and his colleagues' three-component model of student engagement, and Sweller's cognitive load theory to explore how generative AI tools influence students' cognitive engagement from a perspective of multimodal learning theory; The main point is that Generative AI brings about a qualitative change in the environment for multimodal learning - Conditions such as dynamic personalised interactive content generation, including text-image-dialogue modes, which can enhance the quality of cognition while carrying potential dangers of shallow processing and learners' dependence on technology. The article first explores how generative artificial intelligence can trigger more profound cognitive processes; Then investigate the circumstances under which these mechanisms tend to enhance rather than replace true intellectual work, And Finally consider its consequences for pedagogy Construction design teachers Professional Development, The equitable distribution of use in diverse learning situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Mayer RE. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press; 2001.

[2] Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research. 2004;74(1):59–109.

[3] Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science. 1988;12(2):257–285.

[4] OpenAI. GPT-4 Technical Report. OpenAI; 2023. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774

[5] Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR, editors. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academies Press; 2000.

[6] Cope B, Kalantzis M. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review. 1996;66(1):60–92.

[7] Ouyang F, Jiao P. Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2021;2:100020.

[8] Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019;16(1):39.

[9] Holstein K, McLaren BM, Aleven V. Improving the effectiveness of human-AI collaboration in student-facing educational AI. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM; 2019.

[10] Kasneci E, Seßler K, Küchemann S, et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences. 2023;103:102274.

Downloads

Published

21 May 2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yuan, Z. (2026). Effects of Generative AI on Students’ Cognitive Engagement from a Multimodal Learning Perspective. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 23(2), 14-17. https://doi.org/10.54097/j9rd2b76