Market Analysis of Lululemon: A Case Study in Sustainable, Ethical, and Social Marketing

Liyuan Wang

doi:10.54097/hbem.v16i.10642

Authors

Liyuan Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v16i.10642

Keywords:

Lululemon, market analysis, competitive position, sustainability, brand communication.

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive market analysis of the Lululemon brand. The paper begins by introducing the background and development of Lululemon Company, including its positioning and strategies. It then discusses in detail Lululemon's competitive position in the market, as well as its strategies and practices in sustainability, ethics, and social marketing. The paper also analyzes Lululemon's market performance and competitive advantages, with a particular focus on its strategic positioning in the global market. Additionally, the paper examines Lululemon's marketing activities and brand communication strategies, along with recommendations for future development. The findings of this study offer insights into the market position and success factors of Lululemon, providing valuable references for other companies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aragoncillo, L. and Orus, C. (2018). Impulse buying behaviour: an online-offline comparative and the impact of social media. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 22(1), pp.42–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/sjme-03-2018-007.

Byrne, D. V. (ed.) (2020) Consumer preference and acceptance of food products. Basel, Switzerland: MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-03943-696-5 (Accessed: 2023).

Chiang, I-Ping. (2018). Measuring The Effects of Online-to-Offline Marketing. Contemporary Management Research, 14(3), pp.167–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.18462.

Dyer, S. (ed.) (2022) Shopping and the senses, 1800-1970 : a sensory history of retail and consumption. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-90335-0.

Giacino, J.T. (1996). Sensory stimulation: theoretical perspectives and the evidence for effectiveness. NeuroRehabilitation, 6(1), pp.69–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-1996-6108.

Tybout, A.M. (2017). Lululemon Athletica. Kellogg School of Management Cases, pp.1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/case.kellogg.2021.000029.

Gill, G.K., McNally, M.J. and Berman, V. (2018). Effective diversity, equity, and inclusion practices. Healthcare Management Forum, 31(5), pp.196–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470418773785.

Combs, G.M., Milosevic, I. and Bilimoria, D. (2019). Introduction to the Special Topic Forum: Critical Discourse: Envisioning the Place and Future of Diversity and Inclusion in Organizations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(3), pp.277–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051819857739.

Sally, B.; Debora J, G. and David Lynn, H. (2019). Is Lululemon Athletica’s Turnabournd Sustainable? American Journal of Management, 19(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v19i2.2065.