Classic Case Study of Price Discrimination in the Age of Big Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v20i.12317Keywords:
Price discrimination, Government, Consumer, Rights, Big Data.Abstract
The popularization and development of big data in the age of the Internet have enabled merchants to implement price discrimination through personalized pricing strategies based on consumers' personal information and behavioral data. This paper presents a classic case study of price discrimination in the era of big data, focusing on examples from the travel industry, internet shopping, and e-commerce platforms. The case study highlights the social unfairness caused by price discrimination, as it leads to different prices for the same goods among different groups of consumers, violating the principle of fair trade. It also points out the information asymmetry between consumers and merchants, where consumers may find it difficult to determine if they are being discriminated against in pricing. Additionally, the study examines the implications of price discrimination on consumer rights and interests, emphasizing the need for fair and reasonable prices for consumers. The legal and ethical issues surrounding the use of personal information in price discrimination are also addressed. The paper suggests that government regulation, especially through antitrust laws, plays a crucial role in addressing price discrimination. It emphasizes the importance of strengthening regulatory review, increasing penalties, and focusing on a level playing field to promote fair competition and protect consumer rights. In conclusion, the study sheds light on the complexity and significance of price discrimination in the age of big data. It underscores the responsibility of governments and regulators in safeguarding consumer rights, maintaining fair competition, and formulating effective regulations to address price discrimination issues.
Downloads
References
Yunpeng Hu. Research on BDDP regulation of Internet platform [D]. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2022.
Ruxue Ji, Guodong Yan, Yunan Liu. Research on the Phenomenon of "Killing Familiarity" and Countermeasures of Big Data--Based on the Perspective of Price Discrimination [J]. Operation and Management, 2022(11): 33-38.
Shimiao Li, Li Zhang, Libin Zhang. A Review of Domestic Research on BDDP [J]. Knowledge Management Forum, 2022, 7(06): 674-691.
Qunfeng Chen, Enhui Zhou. Antitrust Law Regulation of Algorithmic Price Discrimination in the Digital Economy Era [J]. Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, 2023(03): 207-219.
Jing Wen. Why was Ctrip challenged again for "killing familiarity with big data" [EB/OL]. (2019-03-12) [2023-07-20] https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1627767581739874991&wfr=spider&for=pc.
Jinyun Sun. 2020 Research Report on the Current Situation of Taxi Software Travel [EB/OL]. (2021-03-03) [2023-07-20] https://posts.careerengine.us/p/603f7c7a02ca1822d83ce6e3.
Xiaoxiang Morning Post. Sam's Club exposed as "robbing rich" [EB/OL]. (2021-04-02) [2023-07-20] https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1695923196149410249&wfr=spider&for=pc.
Tao Wu, Qing He. The U.S. "Apple E-Book Price Monopolization Case" Argument Explanation [J]. Law, 2017(02): 160-172.
Peng Wang. Study on operation model of e-commerce platforms based on consumer heterogeneity [D]. Xidian University, 2021.
Junlin Li. Antitrust and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from the Enactment and Revision of Chinese Antitrust Law [D]. Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






