Optimal Proportions of Capital Structure under Different Influential Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v20i.12359Keywords:
Capital Structure, Debt ratio, Equity ratio, Different Industries, Different countries.Abstract
Noting the absence of articles addressing how each company should choose the optimal proportion of capital structure, this paper explores the best proportion selection of a company's capital structure under the influence of various factors. Firstly, a concise summary of existing theories on capital structure is provided. Subsequently, this paper focuses on two influencing factors: company industry and country of operation. For each factor, further subdivisions are made. Industries are categorized into three types: heavy assets with long cycles, light assets with short cycles, and research and development. Likewise, countries are divided into developed and developing countries. For each scenario, the optimal proportion of debt and equity is explored. The conclusion is that heavy asset with long cycles tends to have a larger proportion of debt, while light asset with short cycles and research and development industries tends to have a higher proportion of equity. Developed countries have substantial proportions of both debt and equity, leaning more towards equity financing. In contrast, developing countries face relatively more challenges in accessing both debt and equity financing and, therefore, rely more on debt financing.
Downloads
References
Wang J. Development of the Investment Strategy of Huawei Company[J]. 2022.
Herciu M, Ogrean C. Does capital structure influence company profitability? [J]. Studies in Business & Economics, 2017, 12(3).
Daskalakis N, Kakavas A, Missiakoulis S. Do industry differences affect firm-specific capital structure determinants? [J]. The European Journal of Finance, 2022: 1-11.
An D. China Evergrande, which is super indebted, has a net loss of 100 billion euros in two years. [EB/OL] (2023-07-18) [2023-08-10] RFI. https://www.rfi.fr/cn/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD/20230717-%E8%B6%85%E7%BA%A7%E8%B4%9F%E5%80%BA%E7%9A%84%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%81%92%E5%A4%A7%E4%B8%A4%E5%B9%B4%E5%87%80%E4%BA%8F%E6%8D%9F1000%E4%BA%BF%E6%AC%A7%E5%85%83
Aqil M, Ahmed R R, Vveinhardt J, et al. Factors influencing the profitability of heavy vehicle industry: a case of Pakistan[J]. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 2019, 15(1): 61-72.
Gleason K C, Mathur L K, Mathur I. The interrelationship between culture, capital structure, and performance: evidence from European retailers[J]. Journal of business research, 2000, 50(2): 185-191.
Gill A, Biger N, Mathur N. The effect of capital structure on profitability: Evidence from the United States[J]. International journal of management, 2011, 28(4): 3.
Frank R G, Dach L, Lurie N. It was the government that produced COVID-19 vaccine success[J]. Health Affairs Forefront, 2021.
Gardner J C, McGowan Jr C B, Moeller S E. Using Microsoft corporation to demonstrate the optimal capital structure trade-off theory[J]. Journal of Economic and Financial Education, 2010, 9(2): 29-3
Talberg M, Winge C, Frydenberg S, et al. Capital structure across industries[J]. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 2008, 15(2): 181-200.
Fan J P H, Titman S, Twite G. An international comparison of capital structure and debt maturity choices[J]. Journal of Financial and quantitative Analysis, 2012, 47(1): 23-56.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






