Study On Trade Efficiency and Influencing Factors Between China and CPTPP Member Countries

Authors

  • Ziyi Ding
  • Hongbing You

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v20i.13293

Keywords:

CPTPP; Stochastic Frontier; Trade Efficiency.

Abstract

Based on the current development situation of economic and trade cooperation between China and CPTPP countries, this paper summarizes the bilateral trade between China and eleven member countries, describes the scale of bilateral trade, trade trend and trade balance, describes the trade structure and analyses the market structure. Using the stochastic frontier gravity model to analyze the trade efficiency, trade inefficiency, and influencing factors between China and CPTPP member countries, it is found that the trade between China and CPTPP member countries develops rapidly, the scale is increasing, and the main import and export products are machinery and transport equipment; secondly, the economic scale of China and CPTPP member countries has a positive impact on the trade efficiency, and it is important to strengthen the connectivity of liner shipping, signing FTAs, and to enhance the trade efficiency of China and its member countries. Secondly, the economic scale of China and CPTPP member countries has a positive impact on trade efficiency, strengthening liner shipping connectivity and signing FTAs can reduce trade barriers, which is conducive to trade exports and improve trade efficiency. Finally, there is a large difference in trade efficiency between China and CPTPP member countries, and the Asia-Pacific region has a greater trade potential. Given the above findings, the article puts forward relevant suggestions, to improve trade efficiency, docking international high standards of trade norms, should optimize the commodity structure, strengthen the construction of logistics, and actively promote the FTA negotiations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fan Ying. The characteristics and influence of CPTPP and China's countermeasures. Contemporary World, 2018(09):8-12.

Bai Jie, Su Qingyi. CPTPP rules, Impacts and China's countermeasures: An analysis based on comparison with TPP. International Economic Review, 2019(01):58-76+6.

Yu Peng, Liao Xianglin, Du Guochen. A comparative study of RCEP and CPTPP and policy suggestions. Intertrade, 2021(08):27-36.

Yu Miaojie, Jiang Haiwei. Comparative study and policy recommendations of RCEP and CPTPP. International Economic Review, 2021(02):129-144+7.

Liu Bin, Yu Jimin. The feasibility and path choice of China joining CPTPP. Asia-Pacific Economic Review, 2019(05):5-13+149.

Zhou Hanmin, Huang Hua. Necessity and feasibility analysis of China joining CPTPP. Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, 2021, 28(03):5-17.

Guan Bing, Liang Yixin. Should China join the CPTPP? —General equilibrium analysis based on GTAP. Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, 2019(03):71-82.

Peng Lei, Jiang Yue. An empirical study on the feasibility of China’ s accession to CPTPP and the alternative. International Economics and Trade Research, 2021, 37(08):99-112.

Ge Ming, Yan Shili, Zhao Suping. Research on the competitiveness and complementarity of agricultural products trade between China and CPTPP. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2022(12):121-135.

Zhao Lingfei, Lang Lihua. From TPP to CPTPP: A simulation study on the internationalization of China manufacturing industry: Based on GTAP model analysis. International Business, 2018(05):61-72.

Eugene K.B. Tan. Singapore in 2020: The "crisis of a generation"–Challenges, change and consequences. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2021.

Petri P. A, M. G. Plummer. The Trans-Pacific partnership and Asia-Pacific integration, policy implication. Peterson Institute for International Economics Policy Brief, 2020.

Nilsson L. Trade integration and the EU economic membership criteria. European Journal of Political Economy, 2000, 16(4):807-827.

Egger P. An econometric view on estimation of gravity models and the calculation of trade potentia1. The World Economy, 2002, 25(2):297-32.

Meeusen Wim, Van Den Broeck, Julien. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 1977(2):435-444.

Aigner D, Lovell C A K, Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models Jl. Journal of Econometrics, 1977,6(1): 21-37.

Battese G E, Coelli T J. Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1992(1).

Wu. Export potential and determinants among the Chinese regions. Working Papers, 2003.

Armstrong S. Measuring trade and trade potential: A survey. East Asian Bureau of Economic Research, 2007.

Tan Xiujie, Zhou Maorong. Export potential of 21st-Century maritime silk road and lts determinants: an empirical research based on stochastic frontier gravity model. Journal of International Trade, 2015, 386(02):3-12.

Hsieh, P L. New Asian regionalism in international economic law. Cambridge University Press, 2022:67-71.

Suominen, K. CPTPP as a global "docking station" for free traders? prospective members and potential gains. Center for Strategic and international Studies, 2024, 1-15.

Feng Anquan. Strategic considerations on China joining CPTPP under the new development pattern. Economic Review Journal, 2021(07):79-84.

Downloads

Published

30-11-2023

How to Cite

Ding, Z., & You, H. (2023). Study On Trade Efficiency and Influencing Factors Between China and CPTPP Member Countries. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 20, 567-576. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v20i.13293