The Impact of Cost Leadership Strategy on the Development of High-Quality Businesses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v20i.14736Keywords:
Cost leadership strategy, the Development of High-Quality Businesses, Financing constraints, Growth.Abstract
Based on the 2015-2021 Chinese A-share listing data, this paper empirically investigates the impact of cost leadership strategy on the level of high-quality development of enterprises and its mechanism of action, in combination with the cost leadership strategy index at the enterprise level. Cost leadership strategy is found to have a significant positive impact on the level of high quality business development, and this finding still holds after robustness testing using multiple methods. Mechanistic analyses show that funding constraints negatively moderate the relationship between cost leadership strategy on firms' level of high quality development. In contrast, firms' growth positively moderates the relationship between cost leadership strategy on the firms' high-quality development level. As per heterogeneity analysis, high-tech companies that frequently use big data technology, high-tech companies, and companies with a moderate percentage of management shareholding all see an increase in their firms' high-quality development levels as a result of the cost leadership strategy. The research in this paper is instructive for how better enterprises can promote the adoption of cost leadership strategy for the high-quality development of enterprises.
Downloads
References
Lin, T., Wang, L., & Wu, J. (2022). Environmental Regulations, Green Technology Innovation, and High-Quality Economic Development in China: Application of Mediation and Threshold Effects. Sustainability, 14 (11), 6882.
ELLUL, A., & YERRAMILLI, V. (2013). Stronger Risk Controls, Lower Risk: Evidence from U.S. Bank Holding Companies. The Journal of Finance, 68 (5), 1757–1803.
Zacharia, Z. G., Nix, N. W., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). Capabilities that enhance outcomes of an episodic supply chain collaboration. Journal of Operations Management, 29 (6), 591–603.
Amit, R. (1986). Cost leadership strategy and experience curves. Strategic Management Journal, 7 (3), 281–292.
Schätzlein, L., Schlütter, D., & Hahn, R. (2022). Managing the external financing constraints of social enterprises: A systematic review of a diversified research landscape. International Journal of Management Reviews.
Yam, K. C., Christian, M. S., Wei, W., Liao, Z., & Nai, J. (2018). The Mixed Blessing of Leader Sense of Humor: Examining Costs and Benefits. Academy of Management Journal, 61 (1), 348–369.
Gale, B. T. (1972). Market Share and Rate of Return. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 54 (4), 412.
Nguli, J. (2020). Effect of Entrepreneur Innovativeness on Financial Inclusion among Women Owned Enterprises in Kenya. Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 3 (9), 47–57.
Pelham, A. M., & Wilson, D. T. (1996). A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24 (1), 27–43.
Pissarides, F. (1999). Is lack of funds the main obstacle to growth? ebrd’s experience with small- and medium-sized businesses in central and eastern europe. Journal of Business Venturing, 14 (5-6), 519–539.
Hsieh, C.-T., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India*. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124 (4), 1403–1448.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






