How Can East Asia Culture Tradition Foster a Rapidly Growing Economy

Authors

  • Jilin Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v21i.14791

Keywords:

Culture tradition; values; economy development.

Abstract

The important influence of culture on economy lies not only in its direct influence on the behavior pattern of economic individuals, but also in its influence on the performance of official systems. Culture is the foundation of official systems and one of the basic conditions for their success. Confucianism originated in China and gradually spread to Japan, the Korean Peninsula and Vietnam. Over the course of thousands of years, it has perfected itself and expanded its influence across a vast area of East and Southeast Asia, forming the cultures and traditions of those regions. The rapid and unprecedented economic success of East Asia, including South Korea, has led scholars to tend to study East Asian economic development from a cultural perspective, recognizing that economically successful East Asian countries are all influenced by a common culture of Confucianism. Taking South Korea as an example, this paper selects two characteristics of East Asian culture, big government and emphasis on education, and analyzes that East Asian culture and values not only adapt to modern economy, but also foster a rapid economic growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Porter M.E. Attitudes, values, beliefs, and the microeconomics of prosperity. Culture Matters. New York: Basic Books, 2000.

Kwon O.Y. Does culture matter for economic development in Korea? The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 2011, (1): 163-182.

Ahn C.Y, Kim J.H. The outward-looking trade policy and the industrial development of South Korea. The Korean Economy, 1995, (2): 339-382.

Horikane Y. The political economy of heavy industrialization: the heavy and chemical industry (HCI) push in South Korea in the 1970s. Modern Asian Studies, 2005, 39(2): 369-397.

Auty R.M. The macro impacts of Korea's Heavy industry drive re‐evaluated. The Journal of Development Studies, 1992, 29(1): 24-48.

Han J.H. Education and industrialization: The Korean nexus in human resources development. Education Economics, 1994, 2(2): 169-185.

Shin J.C. Higher education development in Korea: Western university ideas, Confucian tradition, and economic development. Higher education, 2012, 64: 59-72.

Lee P.S. Economic crisis and chaebol reform in Korea. APEC Study Centre, Discussion Paper Series, 2000.

Kalinowski T, Cho H. The political economy of financial liberalization in South Korea: state, big business, and foreign investors. Asian Survey, 2009, 49(2): 221-242.

Young-jin K. Neo-Confucianism as the dominant ideology in Joseon. Korea Journal, 2003, 43(4): 59-86.

Liu H. Influence of China’s imperial examinations on Japan, Korea and Vietnam. Frontiers of History in China, 2007, 2: 493-512.

Im T, Campbell J.W, Cha S. Revisiting Confucian bureaucracy: Roots of the Korean government's culture and competitiveness. Public Administration and Development, 2013, 33(4): 286-296.

Downloads

Published

12-12-2023

How to Cite

Li, J. (2023). How Can East Asia Culture Tradition Foster a Rapidly Growing Economy. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 21, 873-880. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v21i.14791