Social Wellbeing Inequality and Solutions

Authors

  • Ziyou Tang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/6mdf0y90

Keywords:

Income inequality, social wellbeing, Economic growth

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss the topic of income inequality theoretically. Income inequality, a persistent and multidimensional challenge, has deep-seated causes and wide-ranging damages. This paper states several potential causes of the income inequality and gives reasons that why these are the triggers or the catalysts of income inequality. Also, potential damages can be comprehensively indicated in people’s daily life. Income inequality can even influence other social wellbeing that affect the living standard for people. As a global dilemma requiring remedy, comprehensive policy approaches, addressing education, taxation, social safety nets, and more, are necessary to resolve this problem, which are discussed in this paper. Demonstrations about the effect of these policies are made as well. Yet, feasibility varies widely, influenced by political, economic, and social factors. To evaluate these policies, the limitations and drawbacks are vital elements. This paper also includes these evaluations. Crafting an equitable future requires collective effort, drawing on successful policy solutions and acknowledging the complexities of income inequality. While policy implementation may be challenging, the pursuit of a fairer and more just society remains crucial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

U. S. Census Bureau. (2020). *Income and Poverty in the United States: 2019*. Retrieved from https: //www.census.gov/library/publications/2020/demo/p60 - 270.html.

Congressional Budget Office. (2021). *The Distribution of Household Income, 2019*. Retrieved from https: //www.cbo.gov/publication/57068.

Sotiropoulos G. Unequal access to education and income distribution: An international comparison [J]. De Economist, 1977, 125 (3): 383 - 392.

Kang-Kook L E E. Globalization, income inequality and poverty: Theory and empirics [J]. Social System Studies, 2014, 28: 109 - 134.

Coburn D. Income inequality, social cohesion and the health status of populations: the role of neo-liberalism [J]. Social science & medicine, 2000, 51 (1): 135 - 146.

Andrews D, Leigh A. More inequality, less social mobility [J]. Applied economics letters, 2009, 16 (15): 1489 - 1492.

Duncan D, Sabirianova Peter K. Unequal inequalities: Do progressive taxes reduce income inequality? [J]. International Tax and Public Finance, 2016, 23: 762 - 783.

Bohn S, Danielson C. Income inequality and the safety net in California [M]. Public Policy Institute of California, 2016.

Lu M, Jiang S. Labor market reform, income inequality and economic growth in China [J]. China & World Economy, 2008, 16 (6): 63 - 80.

Chohan U W. Universal basic income: A review [J]. Available at SSRN 3013634, 2017.

Downloads

Published

22-01-2024