The Effect of Widespread Social Divides Due to Polarizing Social Media Perspectives on Economic Growth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/yxmaps36Keywords:
Polarization, social media, Marketing, and Consumer IdentityAbstract
Widespread access to social media technology and increasing political polarization has facilitated instruments that create social divide. The economic implication from increasing polarization is the focal point of the study. Analysis was made of producer and viewer biases, political consumption’s implication on behavior, and the economic reactions due to polarization. The review found that social divide is perpetuated by social media regardless of content’s intention due to the concept of political self-preservation. Political polarization in the most radical context can have a large and direct effect on businesses in the rapid short-term context. Company reaction, however, proves that political identity is more centrally identified as a marketing strategy. Overall revenue is the determining factor of political affiliation, companies will not relinquish potential profit and will oscillate political standing to appeal to the most promising circumstances. Findings show how businesses will have increased difficulty marketing to appease increasingly separated social factions without certain objections. Current findings are still limited by the sample of social media platforms and generalized with a few accepted trends in a limited industry scope. Political polarization due to social media and its connection to technology also opens a broader conversation of the potential lack of objectivity and productivity for all future technology and controversial topics when polarization is at the forefront in consumer reaction. Further research into elasticity of products and political polarization, increased reliance and objectivity in viewership, and solutions to identity preservations will provide greater context for future economic trends.
Downloads
References
Ortiz-Ospina E. (2019). The rise of social media. OurWorldInData.org.
University of Maine. (2021). Social Media Statistics Detail. University of Maine.
Phalswal U, Pujari V, Sethi R, Verma R. (2023). Impact of social media on mental health of the general population during Covid-19 pandemic: A systematic review. J Educ Health Promot.
Kubin E, Sikorski C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45:3, 188 - 206.
Lorenz-Spreen P, Oswald L, Lewandowsky S, et al. (2023) A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nat Hum Behav 7, 74 – 101.
Efstratiou A, Cristofaro E. (2022). Adherence to Misinformation on social media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6, CSCW2, 1 - 35.
Perach R, Joyner L, Husbands D, Buchanan T. (2023). Why Do People Share Political Information and Misinformation Online? Developing a Bottom-Up Descriptive Framework. Social Media + Society 9. 3.
Wilson A, Parker V, Feinberg M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 34, 223 - 228.
Ionescu C. G, Licu M. (2023). Are TikTok Algorithms Influencing Users’ Self-Perceived Identities and Personal Values? A Mini Review. Soc. Sci., 12, 465.
Jung J, Mittal V. (2020). Political Identity and the Consumer Journey: A Research Review, Journal of Retailing. V. 96, I. 1, 55 - 73.
Gallego A, Kurer T. (2022). Automation, Digitalization, and Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace: Implications for Political Behavior. Annual Review of Political Science, 25:1, 463 - 484.
Beauvais C. (2022). Fake news: Why do we believe it? Joint Bone Spine, 89 (4): 105371.
Gutierrez A, Punjaisri K, Desai B, Alwi SF, O'Leary S, Chaiyasoonthorn W, Chaveesuk S. (2023). Retailers, don't ignore me on social media! The importance of consumer-brand interactions in raising purchase intention-Privacy the Achilles heel. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 72: 103272.
McCain A. (2023). 26 Vital Branding Statistics [2023]: Need to Know Info for Marketers. Zippia.com.
Buchholz K. (2022). Which countries spend the most time on social media? World Economic Forum.
Selyukh A. (2023). Bud Light boycott takes fizz out of brewer’s earnings. NPR.
Kaye D. (2023). Target says that backlash against LGBTQ+ Pride merchandise hurt sales. NPR.
Chmielewski D. (2023). Disney CEO says company will ‘quiet the noise’ in culture wars, according to analyst note. Reuters.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






