Quantitative Easing’s Effects on the U.S. Housing Market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/atnv5820Keywords:
Quantitative Easing, Real Estate, Global Financial CrisisAbstract
As the housing bubble burst in the United States, the buildup of subprime lending led to the Global Financial Crisis. The Federal Reserve desperately slashes interest rates to reverse the economic recession, but the Zero Lower Bound significantly hindered the policy's future effectiveness with concerns of an existing liquidity trap. As a result, the unprecedented Quantitative Easing became the policymakers' last resort. Through the large-scale purchases of financial assets including mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and government bonds, the Fed attempts to stimulate the economy through reserve creation and instilling downward pressure on future interest rates. This literature review discusses how QE specifically affected the U.S. housing market during the GFC. An analysis is conducted on various social aspects and stakeholders by identifying the various channels through which QE is transmitted. The signaling, bank lending, and refinancing channels all suggest that MBS had the greatest effect on market expectations, bank behaviors, and consumer spending. As a result, many were many spillover effects into real estate, notably on asset prices, employment, and investment. Even though literature has criticized QE's ineffectiveness and its potential drawbacks, the unconventional monetary policy certainly played an essential role in preventing a worse outcome and effectively demonstrating its ability to reduce interest rates, generate wealth, and revive the economy.
Downloads
References
Williamson, S. D. (2017, August 18). Quantitative Easing: How Well Does This Tool Work? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Bhattarai, S., Eggertsson, G., & Gafarov, B. (2015). Time Consistency and the Duration of Government Debt: A Signalling Theory of Quantitative Easing. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series.
Hancock, D., & Passmore, W. S. (2014). How the Federal Reserve’s Large-Scale Asset Purchases (LSAPS) Influence Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) Yields and U.S. Mortgage Rates. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Wang, G. (2019). The Effects of Quantitative Easing Announcements on the Mortgage Market: An Event Study Approach. International Journal of Financial Studies, 7 (1), 9.
Rodnyansky, A., & Darmouni, O. M. (2017). The Effects of Quantitative Easing on Bank Lending Behavior. The Review of Financial Studies, 30 (11), 3858 – 3887.
Chakraborty, I., Goldstein, I., & MacKinlay, A. (2020). Monetary Stimulus and Bank Lending. Journal of Financial Economics, 136 (1), 189 – 218.
Kurtzman, R. J., Luck, S., & Zimmermann, T. (2017). Did QE lead to Lax Bank Lending Standards? Evidence from the Federal Reserve’s LSAPS. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Dhital, S., Dixon, C., & Evanczyk, E. (2023). Quantitative Easing and bank risk-taking behavior. Heliyon, 9 (7).
Fuster, A., & Willen, P. (2010). $1.25 trillion is still real money: Some facts about the effects of the Federal Reserve’s Mortgage Market Investments. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
Maggio, M. D., Kermani, A., & Palmer, C. (2016). How Quantitative Easing Works: Evidence on the Refinancing Channel. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Burya, A., & Davitaya, M. (2022, November 3). Monetary Policy Implications of Heterogeneous Mortgage Refinancing.
Beraja, M., Fuster, A., Hurst, E., & Vavra, J. (2018). Regional Heterogeneity and the Refinancing Channel of Monetary Policy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134 (1), 109 – 183.
Lyytinen, L. (2022, September 18). The Effect of Quantitative Easing on Real Estate Prices.
Huston, J. H., & Spencer, R. W. (2016). The Wealth Effects of Quantitative Easing. Atlantic Economic Journal, 44 (4), 471 – 486.
Jawadi, F., Sousa, R. M., & Traverso, R. (2016). ON THE MACROECONOMIC AND WEALTH EFFECTS OF UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 21 (5), 1189 – 1204.
Gabriel, S. A., & Lutz, C. (2017). The impact of unconventional monetary policy on real estate markets. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Gelfer, S., & Gibbs, C. G. (2023). Measuring the effects of large-scale asset purchases: The role of international financial markets and the financial accelerator. Journal of International Money and Finance, 131.
Rahal, C. (2016). Housing markets and unconventional monetary policy. Journal of Housing Economics, 32, 67 – 80.
Luck, S., & Zimmermann, T. (2020). Employment effects of unconventional monetary policy: Evidence from QE. Journal of Financial Economics, 135 (3), 678 – 703.
Wu, J. C., & Xia, F. D. (2016). Measuring the Macroeconomic Impact of Monetary Policy at the Zero Lower Bound. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 48 (2–3), 253 – 291.
Montecino, J. A., & Epstein, G. (2015). Did Quantitative Easing Increase Income Inequality? SSRN Electronic Journal.
Bivens, J. (2015). Gauging the Impact of the Fed on Inequality During the Great Recession. Hutchins Center Working Papers.
Lee, D. (2021, March 4). Quantitative Easing and Inequality. University of Maryland Department of Economics.
Li, Q., & Zhang, X. (2022, October). Does Monetary Policy Narrow or Widen the Racial Gap in the U.S.? Evidence From the Housing Market. Bank of Canada.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






