How the American and Chinese Customers Differ: Income, Consuming Behavior and Asset Allocation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ywr20f22Keywords:
GDP, Consuming Behaviors, Asset Allocation, Stock Market, Real Estate MarketAbstract
This paper undertakes a meticulous comparative analysis among incomes, consumer behaviors and asset allocations in the United States and China against a backdrop of globalization and economic diversification. It delineates the interplay of demographic trends, urbanization, educational attainments, stock market dynamics, real estate and other factors in shaping consumer preferences and financial strategies in both nations. Central to the findings is the pivotal role of age distributions and educational backgrounds in guiding consumption habits, unveiling a nuanced tapestry of generational and intellectual influences on market demands. Additionally, stark contrasts are observed in asset allocations, particularly in the stock and real estate markets, driven by disparate market maturities, regulatory landscapes, and systemic structures. This research holds substantial significance in enriching the global understanding of cross-national consumer behaviors, uncovering intricate factors and innovative insights that characterize the economic activities of two powerhouse economies. It yields valuable policy recommendations, advocating for enhanced financial literacy and diversified investment avenues to bolster consumer resilience and economic sustainability. Tailored strategies for nurturing educated consumption, investment diversification, and nuanced policy formulations are pivotal for leveraging the profound insights unearthed in this study.
Downloads
References
Ni P, Wang H. Economic competitiveness of China and the US: Comparison, dynamic change and global position [J]. China Economist, 2017, 12 (4): 2 – 31.
Li G, Li O. Chinese and US Economies in Comparison and Interaction: Now and Future as China Economist Surveys [J]. China Economist, 2017, 12 (4): 110 – 133.
Xie Y, Zhou X. Income inequality in today’s China [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014, 111 (19): 6928 – 6933.
Yang Y, Greaney T M. Economic growth and income inequality in the Asia-Pacific Region: A comparative study of china, Japan, South Korea, and the United States [J]. Journal of Asian Economics, 2017, 48: 6 – 22.
Wang G. 70 Years of China: The Changes of Population Age Structure and the Trend of Population Aging [J]. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2019, 3: 2 – 15.
Moon G. H., Yu W. Volatility spillovers between the US and China Stock Markets: Structural break test with symmetric and asymmetric GARCH approaches [J]. Global Economic Review, 2010, 39 (2): 129 – 149.
Chen H, Lobo B, Wong W. Links between the Indian, U.S. and Chinese stock markets. National University of Singapore, Department of Economics, Working Paper, 2006: 602.
Chen J, Jiang F, Li H, et al. Chinese stock market volatility and the role of U.S. economic variables [J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2016, 39: 70 – 83.
Albuquerque B, Anundsen A K, Aastveit K A. The declining elasticity of US Housing Supply [EB/OL]. CEPR, 2020-02-25. (2020-02-25) [2023-10-28]. https: //cepr.org/voxeu/columns/declining-elasticity-us-housing-supply.
Huang W. Government land regulations and Housing Supply Elasticity in urban China [J]. China & World Economy, 2022, 30 (4): 122 – 148.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






