A Comprehensive Analysis of Behavioral Finance and its Impact on Investment Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/jda3dq67Keywords:
Behavioral Finance, Loss Aversion, Momentum, Reversal.Abstract
This paper thoroughly examines behavioral finance, challenging traditional financial theories by questioning investor rationality and market efficiency. Focusing on five key phenomena—loss aversion, short-term momentum, long-term reversal, framing effect, and endowment effect—the analysis relies on real-world observations to reveal how psychological biases significantly impact investor decisions and financial markets. Loss aversion, especially evident during financial crises, highlights humans' tendency to avoid potential losses rather than pursuing equivalent gains. The study explores short-term momentum and long-term reversal, challenging market efficiency theories by illustrating how past performance influences future returns. Emphasizing cognitive biases like framing and endowment effects, the paper underscores their role in diverse investment decisions and irrational asset overvaluation based on a sense of ownership. It advocates for incorporating these biases in financial models, regulations, and investment strategies, emphasizing their importance for stakeholders to navigate the financial landscape, minimize instability, and capitalize on opportunities. The research establishes a foundation for a holistic finance approach, respecting and leveraging human behavior for market stability and benefit.
Downloads
References
Fama, E. (1965). The behavior of stock-market prices. The Journal of Business, 38 (1), 34 - 105.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47 (2), 263 - 291.
Thaler, R. H., Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., & Schwartz, A. (1997). The Effect of Myopia and Loss Aversion on Risk Taking: An Experimental Test. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (2), 647 - 661.
Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too soon and ride losers too long: Theory and evidence. Journal of finance, 40 (3), 777 - 790.
Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48 (1), 65 - 91.
Rouwenhorst, K. G. (1998). International Momentum Strategies. The Journal of Finance, 53 (1), 267 - 284.
De Bondt, W., & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact? The Journal of Finance, 40 (3), 793 - 805.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211 (4481), 453 - 458.
McElroy, T., & Seta, J. J. (2003). Framing effects: An analytic-holistic perspective. Journal of experimental social psychology, 39 (6), 610 - 617.
Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 1053 - 1128.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), 193 - 206.
Morewedge, C. K., Shu, L. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2009). Bad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (4), 947 - 951.
Kogler, C., Kuhbandner, C., & Agthe, M. (2016). Does Ownership Implied by 'Self' Reference Influence Choice? It Depends on Decision Framing. PLOS ONE, 11 (9), e0162091.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






