Review of employees' bootleg innovation behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ghb95e54Keywords:
Bootleg innovation; forming factors; Action result.Abstract
Innovation behavior is an important factor to help enterprises gain competitive advantage. Bootleg innovation, as a special form of enterprise innovation, is becoming more and more common in enterprises. Bootleg innovation means that individuals continue to carry out hidden innovation behaviors because they firmly believe that innovative ideas are beneficial to the organization. Relevant studies show that employees, leaders and organizational factors all have an impact on bootleg innovation. However, the effect of bootleg innovation has not been universally recognized. Studies show that bootleg innovation can improve the innovation performance of employees and organizations, but it may also lead to the decline of organizational efficiency. In this paper, the formation factors and effects of bootleg innovation are sorted out, hoping to provide reference for subsequent research.
Downloads
References
Augsdorfer, Peter, ed. Corporate Underground: Bootleg Innovation and Constructive Deviance. Vol. 39. World Scientific, 2022.
Wang Hong-Yu, Wan Peng-yu. [J]. Modern Finance and Economics (Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics), 20, 40(01):84-97.
Huang Wei, Xiang Guopeng, Du Yunzhou, et al. A study on the relationship between deviant innovation and individual Innovation Performance: The joint moderating effect of status and creativity [J]. Nankai Management Review, 2017, 20(01):143-154.
Chen Wuyang, Ye Maolin, Chen Yushuai, et al. The Influence of Subordinates' Deviant Innovation on Executive Inhibition: The Role of status threat and authoritarianism Orientation [J]. Psychological Science, 2017, 40(03):670-677.
Wang Yan-Zi, Zhang Ting. [5] The Double-edged effect of constructive deviant behavior on individual innovation Performance [J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2019, 42(12):73-78.
Knight K E. A Descriptive Model of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process [J]. The Journal of Business, 1967.
Augsdorfer P. The Manager as Pirate: An Inspection of the Gentle Art of Bootlegging [J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 1994, 3(2).
Paola Criscuolo A S A L. Going Underground: Bootlegging and Individual Innovative Performance [J]. Organization Science, 2014.
Mainemelis C. Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of management review. 2010 Oct; 35 (4): 558-78.
Wu Yingxuan, Cheng Xuesu, Yang Rui, et al. A study on the relationship between resistance innovation and team Innovation Performance: The moderating effect of voice behavior and Job Autonomy [J]. Science of Science and Management of Science and Technology, 2018, 39(12):142-155.
Wang Hongyu, Zou Chunlong, Cui Zhisong. [11] The impact of differential Leadership on Employees' deviant innovation behavior: a moderated mediation model. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2018, 35(09):131-137.
Lin B, Mainemelis C, Kark R. Leaders' responses to creative deviance: Differential effects on subsequent creative deviance and creative performance [J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2016, 27 (4): 537-556.
Wang Hongyu, Cui Zhisong, Zou Chunlong, et al. Loyalty or rebellion? Employee deviant innovation behavior in the Chinese organizational context [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(06):975-989.
Wan Pengyu. A Study on the Structure of deviant Innovation Behavior and Its Impact on Employees' Innovation Performance [D]. Jilin University, 2021.
Warren, Danielle E. Constructive and destructive deviance tn organizations [J]. Academy of management Review, 2003, 28(4): 622-632.
Galperin B L. Exploring the Nomological Network of Workplace Deviance: Developing and Validating a Measure of Constructive Deviance [J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, and 2012 (12): 2988-3025.
Elizabeth E. Umphress J B B. When Employees Do Bad Things for Good Reasons: Examining Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors [J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(3).
Grant A M, Ashford S J. The dynamics of proactivity at work [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2008, 28.
Yang Jianzhao, Li Xiaodi. [J] Proactive Personality influences deviant Innovation performance: The mediating role of innovation Catalyst and the moderating role of transformational leadership Behavior. Journal of Forecasting, 2019, 38(04):17-23.
Tenzer H, Yang P. Personality, values, or attitudes? Individual-level antecedents to creative deviance. International Journal of Innovation Management. 2019 Feb 24; 23 (02): 1950009.
Wang Zhaohui. [J]. Employee perception of excess qualification and deviant innovation: A study on the chain mediation Relationship from the perspective of paradox. Economic Jingwei, 2019, 36(05):128-134.
Jigyashu S, Ronit K. Now You Do It, Now You Don't: The Mixed Blessing of Creative Deviance as a Prosocial Behavior. [J]. Frontiers in psychology, 20, 11.
Nanyangwe C N, Wang H, Cui Z. Work and innovations: The impact of selfâidentification on employee bootlegging behaviour[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2019, 30(4):713-725.
Yang Gang, Song Jianmin, Ji Puhua. [24] Employee Creativity and deviant Innovation: the perspective of psychological privilege and moral disengagement [J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2019, 36(07):115-122.
Huang, Zhu, Wu, et al. A Study on Paradoxical Leadership and Multiple Path Mechanisms of Employees Bootleg Innovation [J]. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 202, 2022.
Wang Hong-Yu, Zou Chun-Long. The impact of transformational Leadership on Employees' deviant innovation: a moderated mediation model [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019, 39(02):165-171.
Liu Xiaoqin. [27] Unethical leadership and employee innovation deviance: An analysis of multiple mediating effects [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(03):188-196.
Wu Shijian, Du Mengzhen, Zhang Jie. The Impact of Authentic Leadership on Employees' deviant Innovation Behavior: The Chain mediating role of organizational self-esteem and constructive Responsibility Cognition and the moderating role of error-averse culture [J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2019, 37(13):141-150. (in Chinese)
Xiong Z, Sheng M, Chunguang Z, et al. As above, so below? The influence of leader humor on bootleg innovation: The mechanism of psychological empowerment and affective trust in leaders [J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13.
Dujuan H, Tongqing Z, Xue D, et al. The "Double-Edged Sword" Effects of LMX Ambivalence---An Integrated Model of Two Approaches Based on Cognitive Flexibility and Job Anxiety. [J]. Psychology research and behavior management, 2022, 15.
Wang Hong-Yu, Zou Chun-Long. [31] Research on the influence mechanism of superior-subordinate Relationship on employees' deviant innovation [J]. East China Economic Management, 2019, 33(04):37-43.
Zhao Le, Le Jiaang, Wang Lei. [J] The Influence of leadership's regulatory focus Behavior on deviant innovation: The joint regulatory role of structural stress of innovation resources and creativity. Forecast, 2019, 38(01):1-7.
Kang Xin, Yin Jing, Feng Zhijun. [J]. The Influence mechanism of managers' Prosocial Behavior on Deviant innovation: The role of regulatory focus and job autonomy. Journal of Technical Economics, 2019, 39(08):35-42.
Dai Xingzheng, Yang Meiyan, Li Yongxiang, et al. Research on All-Employee Innovation Management in Enterprises [M]. 1. Chongqing University Press, 2014.
Wang Hong-Yu, Yu Jiali. [35] Research on the influence mechanism of organizational innovation climate on deviant innovation behavior [J]. Soft Science, 2019, 33(02):126-129.
Zheng Chjian, Hu Peipei. A study on the relationship between organizational support and deviant innovation in Internet Enterprises: the mediating role of job satisfaction [J]. Western Economic Management Forum, 2018, 29(02):72-80.
Globocnik D, Pena Haufler B, Salomo S. Organizational antecedents to bootlegging and consequences for the newness of the innovation portfolio [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 202, 39(5):717-745.
Sarpong D, Appiah G, Bi J, et al. In direct breach of managerial edicts: a practice approach to creative deviance in professional service firms [J]. R&D Management, 2018, 48(5).
Jin Yuxiao, Wang Chenxi, Zhou Yu. [39] Incentives for deviant innovation from the perspective of Personalized Contract [J]. China Human Resources Development, 2018, 35(08):151-163.
Men He, Zhao Huijun, Duan Xu. The impact of Performance Appraisal on Employees' deviant innovation: a moderated mediation Model [J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2019, 38(10):151-160.
Bhatti S H, Irshad R, Shehzad N, et al. Exploring the mediating role of social capital and pro- social motivation in the relationship between CSR and creative deviance[J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2023.
Li Xianmiao, Xu Zhenting, Huo Weiwei. [42] The Impact of creative Deviance on creativity: The mediating role of leadership feedback regulation and innovation self-efficacy [J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2019, 36(06):138-145.
Zhao Bin, Gu Rui, Li Yao. [43] Contextualization of Employees' deviant innovation Success [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2019, 37(11): 2102-2112.
Song Yuan, Shi Dandan. Deviant innovation, Employee autonomy and organizational innovation ability [J]. Journal of Harbin University of Commerce (Social Science Edition), 2020(04):84-93.
Augsdorfer P. Bootlegging and path dependency. Research Policy, 2005, 34(1):1-11.
Cui Zhisong, Wang Hongyu, Zhao Di. "Good Soldier" or "bad Apple"? [46] The Nonlinear Influence Mechanism of Employee constructive Deviance on Team Performance [J]. Business Economics and Management, 2020(12):28-37.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
