The Influence of Neo-Confucian Theory on Southern Korean Economic Development: An In-depth Analysis of the Relationship between Neo-Confucian Culture and Southern Korean Economy

Authors

  • Jiajun Huang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fmwfef43

Keywords:

Neo-Confucian Theory, Southern Korean Economic Development, Confucian capitalism.

Abstract

This article assesses the influence of neo-Confucian theory in fuelling the South Korean economic development. Through an emphasis on the East Asian capitalist model of development encapsulating the interweaving of Confucian ethics and the (universally) revered Western capitalist tenets, this study directs attention to the role of cultural values in economic development. When juxtaposed with the Western model of development, the distinctiveness of the East Asian model of development resides in the fact that it interweaves the central tenets of Confucian ethics to the Western capitalist model of development, forming the basis of the Neo-Confucian theory. This study positions the interconnection between cultural values and economic growth within the divergence of academic scholarship, namely the ‘Confucian as an impediment’ and ‘Confucian as a stimulus’ strands of scholarship to equip with a comprehensive understanding of whether culture can function as an explanatory variable for South Korean economic development. The example of Korean chaebols enables readers to equip the knowledge that while culture performs a constitutive role in the South Korean economic model of development cannot serve as the sole factor for propelling the nation’s economic expansion. This study envisions bridging the widening gap in the dominant scholarship on the role of Confucianism in South Korean economic development by contending that Confucian ethics as the hegemonic ideology creates a favourable climate for the South Korean economic model to flourish.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sleziak, T. The role of Confucianism in contemporary South Korean society. Rocznik Orientalist, 2013, 1, 27-46.

Levi, N. The impact of Confucianism in South Korea and Japan. Acta Asiatica Varsoviensia, 2013. 26, 7-16.

Jinguo, W., Smyth, R., & Hwee, T.D. The role of Confucian values in East Asia development: Before and after the financial crisis. Journal of International and Area Studies, 2000, 7(1), 115-135.

Lew, S., Choi, W., & Wang, H.S. Confucian ethics and spirit of capitalism in Korea: The significance of filial piety. Journal of East Asian Studies, 2011, 11, 171-196.

Loy, N. Culture, institution, and economic development in South Korea. Korean Studies, 2015, 14(1), 151-172.

Huang, M. H., & Chang, S. H. Similarities and differences in East Asian Confucian Culture: A comparative analysis. OMNES: The Journal of Multicultural Society, 2017, 7(2): 1-40.

Sung, L.T. Confucianism and the economic order of Taiwan. International Review of Economic Development, 1998, 12(1), 7-32.

Hamilton, G.G., & Shin, S. Change with continuity: Asian capitalism in transition. In R. Whitley & X. Zhang (Eds.), Changing Asian business systems: Globalization, socio-political change, and economic organization (pp. 161-186). Oxford Scholarship Online. 2016.

Lee, C.Y., & Jennifer, Y.L. South Korean Corporate Culture and Its Lessons for Building Corporate Culture in China. The Journal of International Management Studies, 2014, 9 (2).

Seok, B. The Four–Seven Debate of Korean Neo-Confucianism and the Moral Psychological and Theistic Turn in Korean Philosophy. Religions, 2018, 9(11), 374.

Mitu, B. Confucianism and the contemporary Korean society. Rom. Jour. Of Sociological Studies, 2015, 1, 31-38.

Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Merchant Books. 1904.

Zhang, Y. Neo-Confucian ethics and economic development in East Asia: From the perspective of Confucian modernity and political democracy. Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, 2022, 130-137.

Fairbank, J.K. Chinabound: A Fifty-Year Memoir. Harper and Row. 1982.

Zurndorfer, H. Confusing Confucianism with capitalism: Culture as impediment and/or stimulus to Chinese economic development. ResearchGate. 2018.

ChaiBong, H. How the East was won: Orientalism and the new Confucian discourse in East Asia. Development and Society, 2000, 29(1), 97-101.

Gong, Y., & Jang, W. Culture and development: Reassessing cultural explanations of Asian economic development. Development and Society, 2000, 27(1), 78-97.

Pezzutto, S. Confucianism and capitalist development: From Max Weber and orientalism to Lee Kuan Yew and New Confucianism. Asian Studies Review, 2019, 1-17.

Kim, A.R., & Park, G. Nationalism, Confucianism, work ethic, and industrialization in South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 2003, 33(1), 37-49.

Liu, Z. The influence of Confucianism on East Asian economies. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2018, 232, 77-79.

Murillo, D., & Sung, Y. Understanding Korean capitalism: Chaebols and their corporate governance. ESADgeo, 2013, 1-13.

Saadah, K. The impact of Samsung scandal in corporate culture in South Korea: Is corporate governance necessary? Global & Strategis, 2011, 11(2), 126-134.

Akarsu, M.Z. Chaebol system. International Journal of Afro-Eurasian Research, 2021, 6(12), 20-30.

Chang, J., & Lee, K. Challengeable issues and status of large corporate group policy to discourage concentration of economic power. Journal of Korea Development Economic Association, 2012, 18(1), 225-254.

Lee, K., Lee, C.H. The miracle to crisis and the mirage of postcrisis reform in Korea: Assessment after ten years. Journal of Asian Economics, 2008, 19(5-6), 425-437.

Keunsoo, K. Chaebols and their effect on economic growth in South Korea. Korean Social Sciences Review, 2013,3(2), 1-28.

Downloads

Published

16-06-2024