Research on Copyrightability of Artificial Intelligence Generators

Authors

  • Xinxu Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/gsrgyk70

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence Generators, copyright, intellectual activity.

Abstract

In recent years, the continuous development of artificial intelligence has brought convenience to people's lives but has also given rise to a series of problems. Among these, the gaps in laws related to artificial intelligence has sparked significant controversy, particularly with regard to copyright protection of artificial intelligence products, which has become a focal point of debate in theoretical and practical circles. Some scholars advocate for the protection of artificial intelligence products through copyright, while others argue against it. Based on this, the typical cases have been sorted out and analyzed, relevant provisions of copyright law have been studied, and the issue of the copyright for artificial intelligence products has been explored from both practical and theoretical perspectives. Additionally, in combined with scholars' viewpoints, the copyrightability of artificial intelligence-generated material is examined from the aspects of originality and intellectual achievement. The purpose of establishing the copyrightability of such material is to align with the development trend of the times and, simultaneously, to promote the enhancement of China's copyright legal system in order to foster cultural prosperity and development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Civil Judgment of Beijing Intellectual Property Court (2019) Jing 73 Min Zhong No. 2030.

Civil Judgment of Shenzhen Municipal Nanshan District People's Court (2019) Yue 0305 Min Chu 14010.

Ding Yinan, Lv Dongjuan, Wang Xiandi. Research on the protection of rights of ChatGPT generated content. MEDIA, 2023, (24): 95.

Wang Qian. On the characterization of artificial intelligence generated content in copyright law. Legal Science (Northwest Politics and Law Journal), 2017, 35(05): 148-155.

Naruto v. Slater, No. 16-15469 (9th Cir. 2018).

Wang Qian. Re-argument on the characterization of content generated by artificial intelligence in copyright law. Tribune of Political Science and Law, 2023, 41(04): 20.

Wu Handong. Institutional arrangements and legal regulation in the age of artificial intelligence. Legal Science, 2017, 35(05): 128-136.

Yi Jiming. Are artificial intelligence creatives works?. Legal Science (Journal of Northwest University of Politics and Law), 2017, 35(05): 137-147.

Wang Xueqiao. Legislative research on intellectual property protection of artificial intelligence generated objects. Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2020, 23(02): 96-102.

Huang Hui, Huang Jie. Reasonableness of artificial intelligence generated objects being considered as works for protection. Jiangxi Social Science, 2019, 39(02): 33-42+254.

Li Weimin. Reconstruction of job work system and selection of copyright attribution path for artificial intelligence works. Law Review, 2020, 38(03): 108-124.

Zhu Mengyun. On the copyright protection of artificial intelligence generated objects. Beijing: Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2021.

Civil Judgement of Beijing Internet Court (2023) Jing 0491 Min Chu 11279.

Liu Ying. The preliminary exploration of the copyright law protection of artificial intelligence generated objects. Intellectual Property, 2017, (09): 44-50.

Li Ruoyi, Wang Lin, Jia Jiye. Plagiarism or creation of intellectual property risks behind ChatGPT. China Youth Daily, 21 Feb. 2023, Vol. 6.

Zhao Xinle, Zhu Lina. ChatGPT bursts into flames, what copyright issues does it bring?. China Press, Publication, Radio and Television Newspaper, 16 Feb. 2023, 5.

Wang Qian. A Course in Intellectual Property Law, Beijing: People's University of China Press, 2007.

L.Batlin, Son, Inc., Appellee, v .Jeffrey Snyder d/b/a/J.S.N.Y. and Etna Products Co., Inc., Appellants, 536 F. 2d 486 (1976).

Li Weimin. The positive determination of artificial intelligence intellectual achievements in copyright law - Discussion with Prof. Wang Qian. Social Science Digest, 2018, (07): 34-36.

Yang Shuxing. Objectivist criteria for judgment of the originality of works. Electronic Intellectual Property, 2007, (08): 63-64.=

Downloads

Published

08-08-2024

How to Cite

Wang, X. (2024). Research on Copyrightability of Artificial Intelligence Generators. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 39, 277-281. https://doi.org/10.54097/gsrgyk70