Comparative Analysis of Portfolio Management Models: Markowitz, CAPM, and Multi-Factor Models

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of three foundational portfolio management models: the Markowitz Efficient Frontier, the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), and Multi-Factor Models. It aims to explore their theoretical foundations, empirical applicability, and practical usage to assess their strengths and limitations in financial portfolio management. The Markowitz model is appreciated for its detailed risk-return optimization framework but criticized for its reliance on historical data and computational demands. The CAPM simplifies risk assessment through market beta, yet its assumptions of market efficiency and a risk-free rate are viewed as impractical under current market conditions. Multi-Factor Models address some limitations of the CAPM by incorporating various risk factors, offering enhanced explanatory power but also adding complexity in factor selection.The study concludes that while no single model is universally superior, the choice of model should depend on the specific needs of the portfolio manager, including risk-return objectives and market environment. The paper suggests a blended or adaptive approach to model selection, highlighting the need for flexibility in response to evolving market dynamics and advances in computational finance.