A Pilot Study on Timing of Immediate Information Affects Work Performance and Langer Mindfulness Negatively Predict Work Performance

Lipeng Lin

doi:10.54097/hbem.v1i.2577

Authors

Lipeng Lin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v1i.2577

Keywords:

Interruptions; Instant Messages; Langer Mindfulness; Workplace Performance.

Abstract

Instant messaging (IMing) applications are already widely used in work settings, but some argue that the intrusive nature of instant messaging can affect productivity. Langer Arian Mindfulness is considered to be associated with work performance. The purpose of the present pilot study was to explore the impact of instant messaging and Langer Mindfulness on work outcomes. Total 30 participants were recruited, a mixed design experiment was conducted, Participants were divided into a control group (do not received IMing during the task) and an experimental group (received and responded to 8 immediate messages during the task). Participants were first asked to fill out the Langer Mindfulness scale (LMS), then were asked to watch a 12-minute video and complete a test on the content of the video to test their memory of the video content. Within the experimental group, the timing of the pop out of the 8 instant messages was carefully designed to be divided into masked messages (appearing 10 seconds before the appearance of the to-be-tested message) and non-masked messages (appearing 10 seconds after the appearance of the to-be-tested message). Result indicated that for instant message effect, after controlling for subjective difficulty of subjects on the post-experiment test, only non-masked immediate information impaired subject performance, which suggested the timing sensitive of interruption. For effect of mindfulness, the LMS negatively predicted task performance. Stepwise regression showed that the Flexibility subscale of LMS negatively predicted task performance, and the higher the Langer Mindfulness, participants were more vulnerable to be affected by immediate information.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brooker, J. E., Webber, L., Julian, J., Shawyer, F., Graham, A. L., Chan, J., & Meadows, G. (2014). Mindfulness-based training shows promise in assisting staff to reduce their use of restrictive interventions in residential services. Mindfulness, 5(5), 598-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0306-2.

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(4), 822. https://doi.org/ 10. 1037/ 0022-3514.84.4.822.

Carbonell, X., Oberst, U., & Beranuy, M. (2013). The cell phone in the twenty-first century: A risk for addiction or a necessary tool. Principles of addiction, 1(1), 901-909. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-398336-7.00091-7.

Conard, M. A., & Marsh, R. F. (2014). Interest level improves learning but does not moderate the effects of interruptions: An experiment using simultaneous multitasking. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 112-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.11.004.

Glomb, T. M., Duffy, M. K., Bono, J. E., & Yang, T. (2011). Mindfulness at work. In Research in personnel and human resources management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https:/ /doi.org/ 10.1108/ S0742-7301(2011)0000030005.

John, S., Verma, S., & Khanna, G. (2012). The effect of music therapy on salivary cortisol as a reliable marker of pre competition stress in shooting performance. Journal of Exercise Science and Physiotherapy, 6(2), 70-77. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.846896992796652.

Langer, E. J. (1989a). Mindfulness and mindlessness. The production of reality: essays and readings on social interaction, 153-157.

Langer, E. J. (1989b). Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness–mindfulness. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 137-173). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601 (08) 60307-X.

Langer, E. J. (2004). Langer mindfulness scale user guide and technical manual. Covenington, IL: IDS.

Langer, E. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2000a). The construct of mindfulness. Journal of social issues, 56(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00148.

Langer, E. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2000b). Mindfulness research and the future. Journal of social issues, 56 (1), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00155.

Lebbon, A. R., & Sigurjónsson, J. G. (2016). Debunking the instant messaging myth? International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 433-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.003.

Networked Workers. (2008). Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www. pewresearch. org/ internet/ 2008/09/24/networked-workers/.

Maina, T. M. (2013). Instant messaging an effective way of communication in workplace. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.8489. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1310.8489.

Mansi, G., & Levy, Y. (2013). Do instant messaging interruptions help or hinder knowledge workers’ task performance? International Journal of Information Management, 33(3), 591-596. https:// doi.org/ 10.1016/ j. ijinfomgt.2013.01.011.

Pirson, M., Langer, E. J., Bodner, T., & Zilcha-Mano, S. (2012). The development and validation of the Langer mindfulness scale-enabling a socio-cognitive perspective of mindfulness in organizational contexts. Fordham University Schools of Business Research Paper. https://dx. doi.org/ 10.2139/ ssrn. 2158921.

Rieken, B., Schar, M., & Sheppard, S. (2016). Trait Mindfulness in an Engineering Classroom. Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757464.

Spira, J. B., & Feintuch, J. B. (2005). The cost of not paying attention: How interruptions impact knowledge worker productivity. Report from Basex.

Wang, Z., David, P., Srivastava, J., Powers, S., Brady, C., D’Angelo, J., & Moreland, J. (2012). Behavioral performance and visual attention in communication multitasking: A comparison between instant messaging and online voice chat. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 968-975. https:// doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.chb.2011.12.018.

Wilmer, H. H., & Chein, J. M. (2016). Mobile technology habits: patterns of association among device usage, intertemporal preference, impulse control, and reward sensitivity. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23(5), 1607-1614. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1011-z.

Wolever, R. Q., Bobinet, K. J., McCabe, K., Mackenzie, E. R., Fekete, E., Kusnick, C. A., & Baime, M. (2012). Effective and viable mind-body stress reduction in the workplace: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of occupational health psychology, 17(2), 246. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027278.