Anchoring Effect and People’s Behaviour Decision Making: A Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v11i.8099Keywords:
Anchoring Effect, Anchor Marketing, Cognitive Bias.Abstract
Many people may not have a systematic understanding of the anchoring effect theory, but they are often dominated by this behavior. The anchoring effect is widely used in economic and consumer decision-making behavior, and people often use it unconsciously or consciously, and it is seriously affected in judgment. This paper intends to conduct a comprehensive and systematic study on the anchoring effect to find out how the anchoring effect works in people's lives, in corporate pricing, and in marketing. This article adopts literature analysis method and case analysis method. Firstly, through the literature review, the development and theoretical framework of the anchoring effect are systematically sorted out. Secondly, this paper selects typical cases such as life consumption, corporate behavior, and company marketing to analyze how companies use anchoring effects to achieve their goals, and how consumers are affected by them. This paper finds that the anchoring effect is a common cognitive bias. If companies can make good use of this theory for pricing, publicity, and marketing, they will receive unexpected success. For individuals, they should take the initiative to avoid being affected by the anchoring effect and stick to their own ideas. This paper hopes that through this research, readers can have a clearer understanding of the principle of anchoring effect, and consumers can improve their ability to identify anchoring marketing. This paper also hopes that through this research, readers can have a clearer understanding of the principle of anchoring effect. Enterprises can moderately use this theory to promote products, and corporate consumers can improve their ability to identify anchor marketing.
Downloads
References
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. science, 185 (4157), 1124 - 1131.
Epley, N., and Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological science, 12 (5), 391 - 396.
Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F. (1999). Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 136 – 164.
Jacowitz, K. E., & Kahneman, D. (1995). Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (11), 1161 - 1166.
Epley, N., and Gilovich, T. (2004). Are adjustments insufficient? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (4), 447 - 460.
Epley, N., and Gilovich, T. (2005). When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: Differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 199 – 212.
Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F. (2000). Comparing is believing: A selective accessibility model of judgmental anchoring. In: W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds.) European Review of Social Psychology. (pp. 135 – 167). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Blankenship, K. L., Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., Detweiler-Bedell, B., and Macy, C. L. (2008). Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates: An attitudinal perspective on numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (6), 1465 - 1476.
Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., Blankenship, K. L., and Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2010). Elaboration and numerical anchoring: Implications of attitude theories for consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of consumer psychology, 20(1), 5 - 16.
Lichtenstein, S., and Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89 (1), 46 - 55.
Shapira, Z. and Shaver, J.M. (2013) "Confounding changes in averages with marginal effects: Howanchoring can destroy economic value in strategic investment assessments, “Strategic Management Journal, 35 (10), pp.1414 - 1426. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2165.
Furnham, A., and Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. The journal of socio-economics, 40 (1), 35 - 42.
Foust D, Byrnes N. 2004.Gone flat: the good old days weren't as good as you thought. That's one morereason Coke's latest CEO needs a bold new formula. Business Week 20 December: 76 - 82.
Mussweiler, T. (2001). Sentencing under uncertainty: Anchoring effects in the court room. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1535 – 1551.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






