Success Secret of Apple: How Does It “Manipulate” Consumers’ Behaviors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v11i.8108Keywords:
Apple Inc, endowment effect, status quo bias, marketing strategy.Abstract
Apple is one of the most successful companies in the electronic products industry. Its success is indispensable to its effective marketing strategies. This paper focuses on analyzing the psychological trick it used in its marketing strategy, mainly the endowment effect and status quo bias. It investigates how Apple uses these cognitive biases to attract newcomers to use its products and how it cultivates loyal consumers. The endowment effect refers to a circumstance to which an individual attaches higher importance to the object that they own than the same object they do not own. Apple's showroom enables consumers to play around with its products which gives the consumer a sense of ownership that make consumers become more painful to relinquish its product. Status quo bias describes the circumstance where people prefer to maintain the current state and are reluctant to change. It helps Apple to keep the existing consumers around, which also gives Apple more incentive to constantly upgrade its products and induce consumers to buy. Lastly, this paper will discuss what consumers could do to avoid being “manipulated” by Apple’s marketing strategy and falling into the consumption trap.
Downloads
References
Lan B. Analysis of Apple’s marketing strategy. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 2021.
Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98 (6): 1325 - 1348.
Coase RH. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, 3: 1 - 44.
Morewedge CK, Shu L, Gilbert D, et al. Bad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion cause the endowment effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009, 45 (4): 947 - 951.
Anderson CJ. The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 2003, 129 (1): 139 - 167.
Stir M, Zait A. Impact of direct interaction with virtual objects through touch screens on enhancing psychological ownership and endowment effect. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2022, 1: 1 - 22.
Peck J, Shu SB, John D, et al. The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 2009, 36 (3): 434 - 447.
Maddux W, Yang H, Falk C, et al. For whom is parting with possessions more painful? Cultural differences in the endowment effect. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010, 21 (12): 1910 - 1917.
Wang Xianghong. Retail return policy, endowment effect, and consumption propensity: An experimental study. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2009, 9 (1): 1-29.
Janakiraman N, Syrdal HA, Freling R. The effect of return policy leniency on consumer purchase and return decisions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Retailing, 2016, 92: 226 - 235.
Colin H, Joosen B. Challenging the status quo: What makes a new product succeed. Ipsos Views, 2022, 3: 1 - 16.
Rajan RG. The credit crisis and cycle-proof regulation. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 2009, 91: 461 - 467.
Whitham S. If Apple cared about the environment, the iphone 14 wouldn't really exist. Product Environmental Report, 2022.
Florack A, Kleber J, Busch R, et al. Detaching the ties of ownership: The effects of hand washing on the exchange of endowed products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2013, 24 (2): 284 - 289.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






