Sales Strategy, Risk Investment and Property Rights Allocation: Analysis Based on Endowment Effect

Authors

  • Tianlei Hu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v11i.8109

Keywords:

Endowment effect, loss aversion, behavioral economics, Coase theorem.

Abstract

The endowment effect suggests that people value what they have now and the status quo, and thereby want to avoid losing what they have or just step out of the comfort zone. Several scholars have identified and demonstrated that people’s utility is reduced by a given quantity of loss more than it is increased by an equal amount of gain. Due to the endowment effect, the decision-making process is out of balance, and are more likely to avoid harm rather than pursue profits. This paper reviews the concepts, experiments and applications of endowment effect and loss aversion theory in behavioral economics. Furthermore, it explains endowment effect using three economic applications of sales strategy, risk investment and property rights allocation. In all the three economic applications, people’s economic behavior totally conforms to the endowment effect: people buy things that they don’t need, make the investment irrationally, or bring trade frictions. Due to its commonness, endowment effect has been widely tested and applied, attracting heated discussion among academia research and policy regulators. In this sense, this paper also provides us a good understanding of endowment effect and behavior economics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Laibson D, List JA. Principles of (behavioral) economics. American Economic Review, 2015, 105 (5): 385 - 90.

Acemoglu D, David L, John AL. Economics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2015.

Thaler RH. Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future. American economic review, 2016, 106 (7): 1577 - 1600.

Thaler R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 1980, 1 (1): 39 - 60.

Knetsch JL, Tang FF, Thaler RH. The endowment effect and repeated market trials: Is the Vickrey auction demand revealing? Experimental economics, 2001, 4 (3): 257 - 269.

Marzilli E, Fuster A. The endowment effects. Annual Review of Economics, 2014, 6 (1): 555 - 579.

Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values and frames. American psychologist, 1984, 39 (4): 341 - 347.

Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of risk and uncertainty, 1988, 1 (1): 7 - 59.

Knetsch JL, Sinden JA. Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: Experimental evidence of an unexpected disparity in measures of value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1984, 99 (3): 507 - 521.

Jolls C. Behavioral economics analysis of re-distributive legal rules. Vanderbilt Law Review, 1998, 51: 1653 - 1660.

Knetsch JL, Wong WK. The endowment effect and the reference state: Evidence and manipulations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2009, 71 (2): 407 - 413.

Downloads

Published

09-05-2023