A Review of Research on Enterprise Environmental Performance Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v11i.8152Keywords:
Environmental performance evaluation; environmental performance implications; indicator construction; evaluation methodology.Abstract
The long-term extensive economic growth model has led to increasingly serious environmental problems in China, and enterprise environmental performance evaluation is one of the effective ways to solve environmental problems. This article systematically reviews and sorts out the research achievements on enterprise environmental performance evaluation both domestically and internationally, and analyzes them from three aspects: the definition of enterprise environmental performance, the construction of environmental performance indicators, and the methods of enterprise environmental performance evaluation. It summarizes the current research status of environmental performance evaluation in China, prospects its future research trend, and provides reference for further development.
Downloads
References
Tyteca D. Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms-concepts and empirical results [J]. Journal of productivity analysis, 1997, 8(2):183-197.
Charles J. Corbet, Jeh-Nan Pan. Evaluating environmental Performance using statistical process control techniques [J]. Europe-an Journal of Operational Research, 2002, (139): 68-83.
Tang Jianrong, Zhang Chengxuan. Evaluation of Enterprise Environmental Performance Based on BP Artificial Neural Network [J]. Statistics and Decision, 2006 (22): 161-163.
Zhang Shixing. Research on Enterprise Environmental Information Disclosure Based on Environmental Performance Evaluation [D]. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2009.
CICA. Reporting on Environmental Performance[R]. Toronto, 1994.
International Standard Organization. Environmental Performance Evaluation [Z]. ISO/DIS14031, 1998.
WBCSD. Measuring Eco-Efficiency——A Guide to Reporting Company Performance [M]. Geneva, 2000.
GRI. Sustainability reporting guidelines——G4 sustainability reporting guidelines [R]. Amsterdam, 2014.
A Manual for the Preparers and Users of Eco-efficiency Indicators. UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT. UNCTAD/ITE/IPC/2003/7.
EFRAG. Draft European Sustainability Reporting Standards Appendix II——CSRD Requirements for the Development of Sustainability Reporting Standards and Their Coverage by the Draft ESRS [EB/OL]. www.efrag.org, 2022a-09.
Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. Guidelines for the Preparation of Enterprise Environmental Reports (HJ 617-2011) [M]. China Environmental Science Press 1st edition in August 2011.
Ministry of Environmental Protection, Development and Reform Commission, People's Bank of China, China Banking Regulatory Commission. Measures for Enterprise Environmental Credit Evaluation (Trial) (HF [2013] No. 150).
Hangzhou Municipal People's Government. Hangzhou Corporate Social Responsibility Evaluation System [R]. Hang Fa [2010].
Ministry of Environmental Protection. Guidelines for Environmental Information Disclosure of Listed Companies [Z]. 2011.
Ramos T B. The state of environmental performance evaluation in the public sector: the case of the Portuguese defence sector [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009, 17(1): 36-52.
Jr F H, Hrdlicka H A, Gomes C M, et al. The use of environmental performance indicators and size effect:A study of industrial companies[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 36(2).
Lorne Cummings, Asit Bhattacharyya. Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance-Stakeholder Engagement Evaluation [J]. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2015(24): 309-325.
Federica Cucchiella, Idiano D’Adamo, Massimo Gastald. A comparison of environmental and energetic performance of European countries: A sustainability index [J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017(78): 401-413.
Elias W. Gabisa, Shabbir H, Gheewala. Potential, Environmental, and Socioeconomic Assessment of Biogas Production in Ethiopia: The Case of Amhara Regional State [J]. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2019(122): 446-456.
Zhao Liping, Wan Xiaojuan, Hu Xiaokang. The impact and improvement of MFCA accounting system on environmental performance evaluation [J]. Friends of Accounting, 2016 (24): 80-83.
Chang Yuan, Xiong Yating. Construction of an Environmental Performance Evaluation System Based on Value Chain Theory [J]. Friends of Accounting, 2016 (02): 32-35.
Zhang Benyue, Wang Xianzhu. Innovation in the Application of Balanced Scorecard in Environmental Performance Evaluation [J]. Friends of Accounting, 2017 (19): 99-102.
Zhang Yonghong, Cheng Liyuan, Li Yi. Construction of Environmental Performance Evaluation Index System for Coalbed Methane Enterprises - Based on BSC and GEVA [J]. Friends of Accounting, 2018 (02): 102-106.
Peng Manru, Jin Youliang, Fan Xuan. Construction of Enterprise Environmental Performance Indicators Based on Haze Governance [J]. Journal of Central South University (Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 23 (05): 114-121.
Li Dongwei, Huang Bo. Construction of an Enterprise Environmental Performance Evaluation System Based on PDCA [J]. Finance and Accounting Communication, 2018 (20): 68-71+129.
Zhao Di, Song Xiaolong, Yang Dong, Li Jiawen. Environmental performance evaluation method and application of electronic waste recycling and treatment system [J]. Ecological Economy, 2020, 36 (05): 182-187+207.
Yuan Jingjing, Yuan Guangda, Zhang Yuebin. Research on Environmental Performance Evaluation of Chinese Petroleum Enterprises under the Triple Performance Theory [J]. Friends of Accounting, 2021(03): 110-116.
Wu Sijia. Research on Environmental Performance Evaluation of middling coal Group from the Perspective of Ecological Civilization [D]. East China University of Technology, 2021.
Toshiyuki Sue Yoshi, Mika Goto, Manabu Sugiyama. DEA window analysis for environmental assessment in a dynamic time shift: Performance assessment of U.S.Coal-fired power plants [J]. Energy Economics, 2013(40).
Joseph Sarkis, Srinivas Tallur i. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014(3): 145-187.
Lin Ye. Research on Environmental Performance Evaluation Method Based on Data envelopment analysis -- Taking Marine Transportation Enterprises as an Example [J]. Economic Outlook around the Bohai Sea, 2021 (04): 87-88.
Jiao Rui. Research on Environmental Management Performance in Green Supply Chain Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method [J]. Journal of Southwest Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 45 (09): 71-77.
Cao Yangmin. Research on the Construction and Application of AHP Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Environmental Management Performance Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Enterprises [D]. Zhejiang University of Technology, 2019.
Chen Minmin, Wu Qiong, Zhang Zhen, et al. Research on Environmental Performance Evaluation of Urban Sewage Treatment Plants in China [J]. Environmental Science Research, 2020, 33(12): 2675-2682.
Hao Chunxu, Weng Junhao, Dong Zhanfeng, Ge Chazhong. Evaluation of Provincial Environmental Performance in China Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Resource Development and Market, 2016, 32 (01): 26-30.
Feng Yu, Guo Bingnan. Environmental Performance Evaluation of the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Market Weekly, 2019 (01): 99-102.
Yu Yubing, Zhu Jing. Research on the Construction and Application of Performance Evaluation Indicators for Water Environment Governance - Taking Chengdu City as an Example [J]. Sichuan Environment, 2019, 38 (02): 90-100.
Zhang Ran, Zhang Xin, Sun Meng. Construction of Performance Audit Evaluation Index System for Air Pollution Prevention and Control: From the Perspective of Ecological Civilization Construction [J]. Green Accounting, 2020 (12): 27-33.
Wang Yu, Wang Ying. Research on Performance Audit of Air Pollution Prevention and Control Based on AHP Entropy Weight Method [J]. Accountant, 2021 (22): 95-97.
Yang Jie, Lu Qingxia. Construction of a carbon performance evaluation system for coal enterprises from the perspective of the 3E dimension [J]. Journal of Nanchang Normal University, 2021, 42 (06): 64-68.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
