The Characteristics of China-South Korea Relations from the Perspective of Complex Interdependence

Authors

  • Shiman Cao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v13i.8622

Keywords:

Complex interdependence, China-South Korea relations, Characteristics of development.

Abstract

In the context of economic globalization, the links between countries and different state actors are deepening day by day. Since countries are in such an interrelated and mutually influencing environment, it is of great value to study the relations and development characteristics of countries from the perspective of complex interdependence. In the context of changes in the current economic, political, social and cultural fields between China and South Korea, it is very necessary to analyze these issues from the perspective of complex interdependence. Based on the literature, this paper will analyze the current development characteristics of China and South Korea in various fields, and use PRISMA to screen the relevant literature. To identify the path for the future growth of China and South Korea, which should work together to forge a future-focused China-South Korea relationship as a community with a shared future that depends on and supports one another, as well as to analyze these issues between the two nations, the complex interdependence theory will also be applied.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wu Mingyu. New economic order in Northeast Asia and China-Korean relations. Economic Herald, 1993, (1): 51-53.

Hyun Dongri. China-South Korea economic and trade cooperation after entering the WTO. Economic Management, 2003, (23): 43-46.

Zhou Yudong, Xiao Xiao, Yang Jun. Analysis of the economic impact of the establishment of the China-South Korea Free Trade Area on the Major industries of the two countries -- Based on the Tariff Reduction Plan of the China-South Korea Free Trade Agreement. Journal of International Trade, 2016, (5).

Jin Xiangdan. Challenges and prospects of China-South Korea economic cooperation in the post-COVID-19 era -- Also on Interdependence. Journal of Yanbian University (Social Sciences), 2022, (1): 28-35.

Hwang Jaeho. China-South Korea military relations under the strategic cooperative partnership. Contemporary International Relations, 2009, (7): 57-60.

Chen Xiangyang. The strategic impact of the THAAD deployment on Northeast Asia. Contemporary International Relations, 2017, (4): 1-3.

Sun Ru. The understanding of China's response to the THAAD issue. Contemporary International Relations, 2017, (4): 3-6.

Zhang Yunling. China-South Korea Relations under the new Situation: Challenges and Choices. International Studies, 2022, (5).

Shi Yuanhua. Traditional Culture and Historical Development of China-South Korea Relations. Contemporary Korea, 2002, (2): 22-24.

Park Jongjin. South Korean people's negative cognition towards China and China's public diplomacy approach towards South Korea, Contemporary Korea, 2012, (3): 48-59.

Yu Wanying. Review and Analysis of Korean Youth's cognition of China. Peace and Development, 2022, (4): 119-134.

Jang Sooa. China-South Korea interdependence and the signing of the China-South Korea Free Trade Agreement. Shandong University, 2016.

Chen Chao, Lei Cong. The relationship between China and ASEAN from the perspective of Complex interdependence Theory. Crossroads: Southeast Asian Studies, 2007, (7): 7-11.

Nie Xiyuan. The relationship between China and EU from the perspective of Complex interdependence Theory. Theory Construction, 2009, (2): 37-40.

Li Bing. After three decades of development, China-South Korea relations still remain stable and long-term. Journal of Yanbian University (Social Sciences), 2022, (1): 5-11.

Shao Renli. An Explanation of China-Japanese Relations from the Perspective of Complex Interdependence. Gansu Social Sciences, 2006, (5): 242-244.

Downloads

Published

29-05-2023

How to Cite

Cao, S. (2023). The Characteristics of China-South Korea Relations from the Perspective of Complex Interdependence. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 13, 66-73. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v13i.8622