Analysis of Corporate Sales Strategies in the Presence of Resale Platforms

Authors

  • Le Xu
  • Qinyi Yang
  • Jiajun Song

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v14i.8986

Keywords:

Resale Platform, Consumer Utility, Corporate Profit, Net Product Salvage value.

Abstract

The existence of resale platforms may have a certain cannibalization effect on firms' profits. Using Xiaomi phones as a research object, a two-stage model is developed based on the heterogeneity of consumer preferences for new and old products, with resale platforms only appearing in stage 2. We compare and analyze the maximum profits of electronic durable goods enterprises with direct sales and monopoly on new products under three different forms of resale platforms, i.e., only third-party C2C resale platform, B2C resale platform under enterprise trade-in, and enterprise's own C2C resale platform, to decide whether and how to enter the resale platform and the optimal pricing of products. In the second stage of the study, it was found that in general, enterprises choose to enter the resale platform, and as the price of product 1 in the first stage, the unit cost of product 2 in the second stage and the degree of loss of Second-hand product 1 increase, the optimal entry mode of enterprises changes from the B2C resale platform under trade-in to the self-owned C2C resale platform.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yu Xue, Ozgun Caliskan-Demirag, Youhua (Frank) Chen, Yugang Yu. Supporting customers to sell used goods: Profitability and environmental implications [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 206 (2018): 220 - 232.

Aditya Vedantam, Emre M. Demirezen, Subodha Kumar. Trade-In or Sell in My C2C Marketplace: A Game Theoretic Analysis of Profit and Environmental Impact [J]. Production And Operations Management, 2021: 3923 - 3942.

Huihui Liu, Ming Lei, Tao Huang, G. Keong Leong. Refurbishing authorization strategy in the secondary market for electrical and electronic products [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 195 (2018): 198 - 209.

Yuelin Shen, Sean P. Willems, Yue Dai. Channel Selection and Contracting in the Presence of a Retail Plarform [J]. Production and Operations Management Society, 2019, 28 (5): 1173 - 1185.

Vinay Ramani, Pietro De Giovanni. A two-period model of product cannibalization in an atypical Closed-loop Supply Chain with endogenous returns: The case of Dell Reconnect [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 262(2017):1009 - 1027.

Genc T S, Pietro De Giovanni. Optimal return and rebate mechanism in a closed-loop supply chain game[J]. European Journal of Operational Research. 2018, 269 (2): 661 - 681.

Lee C H, Rhee B D. Retailer-run resale market and optimal returns and resale policy [J]. European Journal of Operational Research. 2018, 2 68 (2): 504 - 514.

Li Y, Feng L, Govindan K, et al. Effects of a secondary market on original equipment manufactures’ pricing, trade-in remanufacturing, and entry decisions [J]. European Journal of Operational Research. 2019, 279 (3): 751 - 766.

Feng L, Zheng X, Govindan K, et al. Does the presence of secondary market platform really hurt the firm [J]. International Journal of Production Economics. 2019, 213: 55 - 68.

Benjaafar, S, G. Kong, X. Li, C. Courcoubetis. 2018. Peer-to-peer product sharing: Implications for ownership, usage, and social welfare in the sharing economy. Management Sci. 65 (2): 477 – 493.

Huang, X., A. Atasu, L. B. Toktay. 2019. Design implications of extended producer responsibility for durable products. Management Sci. 65 (6): 2573 – 2590.

Mantin, B., H. Krishnan, T. Dhar. 2014. The strategic role of thirdparty marketplaces in retailing. Prod. Oper. Manag. 23 (11): 1937 – 1949.

O’Rourke, D., R. Strand. 2017. Patagonia: Driving sustainable innovation by embracing tensions. Calif. Manag. Rev. 60 (1): 102 – 125.

Downloads

Published

12-06-2023

How to Cite

Xu, L., Yang, Q., & Song, J. (2023). Analysis of Corporate Sales Strategies in the Presence of Resale Platforms. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 14, 189-197. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v14i.8986