Impact of Policy Signals on Business Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Financial Subsidy Effects on High-tech Enterprises Using Panel Data from 2095 Listed Companies

Authors

  • Jiawen Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v14i.8987

Keywords:

financial subsidy, high-tech enterprises, policy signals, soft budget constraints, diminishing marginal returns, financial performance, innovation performance.

Abstract

Based on the samples of A-share listed companies with high-tech certification from 2017 to 2021, this study empirically analyzes the influence of financial subsidy as a "policy signal" on the business performance of high-tech enterprises by analogy with Shannon-Weaver communication model. Using the regulatory effect model and intermediary effect model, and with the help of soft budget constraint and diminishing marginal revenue theory, this study analyzes the reasons why financial subsidy affects the enterprise business performance differently. This study indicates that financial subsidy, as a kind of policy signal source, is regulated by the nature and scale of enterprises, and ultimately improves the financial performance and innovation performance of enterprises through the intermediary effect of R&D investment intensity and external market valuation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Xiao Tiaojun, Sheng Zhaohan, Tao Xiangjing. The influence of non-technical factors in technological innovation of enterprise groups and countermeasures. Scientific Research Management, 2000 (03): 11 - 17+101.

Romer P M. Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review, 1987, 77 (2): 56 - 62.

Romer P M. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98 (5, Part2): 71 – 102.

Liu Guangqiang. Analysis of the incentive effect of tax incentives and financial subsidies-an empirical study based on information asymmetry theory. Management World, 2016 (10): 62 - 71.

Ma Weihong. An empirical study on the impact of tax incentives and government subsidies on enterprise R&D investment-based on the panel data of listed high-tech enterprises. Scientific and Technological Progress and Countermeasures, 2011, 28 (17): 111 - 114.

Lu Dong, Lin Gao, Yang Dan. Government Subsidies, R&D Expenditure and Market Value-Empirical Evidence from Hi-tech Enterprises on Growth Enterprise Market. Investment Research, 2012, 31 (09): 67 - 81.

Zheng Chunmei, Li Pei. The impact of government subsidies and tax incentives on the innovation performance of enterprises-an empirical study based on high-tech enterprises in the Growth Enterprise Market. Scientific and Technological Progress and Countermeasures, 2015, 32 (16):83 - 87.

Bi Xiaofang, Zhai Shuping, Jiang Baoqiang. The influence of government subsidies and financial redundancy on dual innovation of high-tech enterprises. Accounting Research, 2017 (01): 46 - 52+95.

Guo Qingguang. Introduction to Communication. Beijing: Renmin University Press, 2011: 51

J.J. van Cuilenburg, D. McQuail. Media en pluriformiteit: een beoordeling van de stand van zaken [M]. Staatsuitgeverij.1982.

TZELEPIS D, SKURAS D. The effects of regional capital subsidies on firm performance: an empirical study. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 2004 (11): 121 - 129.

HEWITT-DUNDAS N, ROPER S. Output additionality of public support for innovation: evidence for Irish manufacturing plants. European Planning Studies, 2010, 18 (1): 107 - 122.

Sun Xiaohua, Guo Xu, Wang Yun. Government Subsidies, Ownership Nature and Enterprise R&D Decision. journal of management sciences in china, 2017, 20 (06): 18 - 31.

Chen Peizhen, Zeng Deming. Li Jian. The impact of technological diversification on new product development of enterprises. Scientific research. 2018 (6): 1070 - 1077.

Zhou K Z, Gao G Y, Zhao H. State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: Ad Integrated View of Institutional end Efficiency Logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2017, 62 (2): 375 - 404.

Guo Bin. Scale, R&D and Performance: An Empirical Analysis of China's Software Industry. Scientific Research Management, 2006 (01): 121 - 126.

Wu Chen. Company diversification, scale and enterprise performance-an empirical study based on listed companies. Statistical Education, 2009 (02): 7 - 10.

Lu Guoqing. Research on the performance of industrial innovation of small and medium-sized listed companies in China. Economic Research, 2011,46 (02): 138 - 148.

Ling Jianghuai, Hu Wenrong. Enterprise scale, financing structure and business performance-based on the comparative study of strategic emerging industries and traditional industries. Finance and Trade Economy, 2012 (12): 71 - 77.

Kostopoulos K, Papachroni M, et al. Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 2011 (12): 1335 – 1343.

Grant R M. Multinationalism and performance among British manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 1987 (3): 79 - 89.

Chen Yuanyan, He Mingjun, Zhang Xinyuan. Financial subsidies, tax incentives and innovative output structure of enterprises——Evidence from high-tech listed companies in China. Tax Research, 2018 (12): 48 - 54.

[23] Cheng Yue, Duan Yu. Research on the impact of financial subsidy policy on enterprise innovation performance-empirical thinking based on resource acquisition ability. Industrial Technology Economy, 2022, 41 (07): 104 - 112.

Wu Jian, Tian Zhilong, Long Xiaofeng, etc. The impact of government subsidies on enterprise innovation in strategic emerging industries. Science Research, 2018, 36 (1): 158 - 166.

Qiu Muyuan, Yin Hong. ESG performance and financing cost of enterprises under the background of ecological civilization construction. Quantitative economic technical and economic research, 2019, 36 (03): 108 - 123.

Dai Xiaoyong, Cheng Liwei. The threshold effect of financial subsidy policy on enterprise R&D investment. Scientific Research Management, 2014 (6): 68 - 76.

Wang Xin, Wang Ying. Research on Green Credit Policy Promoting Green Innovation. Management World, 2021 (6): 173 - 188+11.

Emmanuel B, Mammet Y, Kaze A, et al. Relationship between green supply chain adoption and supplier innovation initiative: Evidence from manufacturing firms in accra metropolis. O pen Journal of Business and Management,2021(6): 13.

Deng Peiqi. Sewage charges tax standard reform and enterprise green technology innovation-based on the empirical analysis of industrial enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2004 to 2017. Taxation and Economy, 2022 [6]: 39-47.)

Wen Zhong-lin, Zhang lei, Hou Jie-tai, Liu Hong-yun. Mediating effect test procedure and its application. Journal of Psychology, 2004, (5): 614 - 620.

Guo Yue. Signal transmission mechanism of government innovation subsidies and enterprise innovation. China Industrial Economy, 2018 (9): 98 - 116.

Chen Qiang. Advanced Econometrics and Stata Application.2nd Edition. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2014.

Kornai J.,1980,” Economics of shortage”, Amsterdam; North-Holland.

Tian Lihui. State-owned property rights, soft budget constraints and leveraged governance of listed companies in China. Managing the World, 2005 (07): 123 - 128+147.

Ling Jianghuai, Hu Wenrong. Enterprise scale, financing structure and business performance-based on the comparative study of strategic emerging industries and traditional industries. Finance and Trade Economy, 2012 (12): 71 - 77.

Downloads

Published

12-06-2023

How to Cite

Liu, J. (2023). Impact of Policy Signals on Business Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Financial Subsidy Effects on High-tech Enterprises Using Panel Data from 2095 Listed Companies. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 14, 198-213. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v14i.8987