Research on the Current Situation and Construction Strategies of Leadership in Listed Companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v14i.9204Keywords:
Leadership; Listed Companies; Performance Management; Employee Motivation.Abstract
At present, more and more companies realize that the leadership-building strategy has an important impact on the company’s development, and begin to focus on how to reasonably build leadership in the company. This article studies the status quo and construction strategies of leadership in listed companies, hoping to summarize and analyze the successful experience and shortcomings of listed companies in leadership construction strategies and give suggestions and methods for improvement. It will help more companies gain more experience in leadership building. This article adopts the case analysis method and analyzes the status of leadership building in the listed society and the problems and causes in the current leadership strategy building of listed companies by analyzing the cases of different listed companies. At the same time, this paper gives solutions to the following problems in listed companies: strategic planning and leadership development, employee diversification, and brain drain. Finally, this article summarizes the experience of many companies that want to build leadership. It also provides solutions and strategies for currently listed companies to improve their leadership-building strategies and status quo.
Downloads
References
The State of Human Capital 2012—False Summit: “Why the Human Capital Function Still Has Far to Go” (PDF–1,204KB), The Conference Board and McKinsey, October 2012.
Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2005). What we know about leadership. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.169
Hughes, R. (2009). Time for leadership development interventions in the public 1health nutrition workforce. Public Health Nutrition, 12(8), 1029. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980009990395
Susan Adams The World’s Best Companies for Leadership (May 2, 2012), (March 1, 2023), https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2012/05/02/the-worlds-best-companies-for-leadership/?sh=201db9e91ce6
Yu, M., & Ashton, J. K. (2015). Board leadership structure for Chinese public listed companies. China Economic Review, 34, 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2015.01.010
BAI Chong en, LIU Qiao, LU Zhou, SONG Min, ZHANG Jun xi. (2005). An Empirical Study on the Governance Structure of Chinese Listed Companies. Economic Research (02), 81-91.
Chin, J. (2018, October 10). Engineering Company Culture Change: Regaining Public Trust After Scandal. https://journals.tulane.edu/ncs/article/view/1346
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2012b). Using performance management to win the talent war. Business Horizons, 55(6), 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.05.007
Kotter, J. (2012). Barriers to change: The real reason behind the Kodak downfall. Forbes, May, 2.
Ryan, J. J., Hawdon, J., & Branick, A. (2002). The Political Economy of Diversity: Diversity Programs in Fortune 500 Companies. Sociological Research Online, 7(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.702
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






