Research on Risk Assessment of Vietnam EPC Wind Power Projects based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Authors

  • Trinh Thi Linh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/3e261e26

Keywords:

Wind Power Project; Risks Management; EPC Contract; Vietnam; Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Abstract

 In the context of burgeoning renewable energy initiatives worldwide, wind power projects have emerged as pivotal players in the realm of clean energy. This is particularly pronounced in emerging markets like Vietnam, where rapid economic growth and escalating energy demands have spurred a surge in wind power endeavors. Focusing on the risk landscape of Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) wind power projects in Vietnam, this study endeavors to pinpoint and evaluate key risk factors impacting project execution while proposing tailored risk mitigation strategies. Through exhaustive literature reviews and consultations with industry experts, 18 principal risk factors spanning policy, social dynamics, natural conditions, and construction management were identified. Through the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) for quantitative evaluation, the study quantifies the impact of risk factors, ultimately determining a moderate overall risk level for a selected 130MW onshore wind farm project in Vietnam. Subsequent to risk assessment, the study advocates for a suite of responsive measures aimed at guiding project management teams in navigating operational challenges, encompassing strategies like enhanced stakeholder communication, financial risk hedging, shared risk allocation, and fortified contract management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

PMI. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide).[M] 6th Edition, Project Management Institute, Inc., Newtown Square, 2017.

International Project Management Association. IPMA Competence Baseline [S]. Nijkerk, The Netherlands: International Project Management Association, 2002.

Abraham Warszawski. Rafael Sacks Practical Multifactor Approach to Evaluating Risk of Investment in Engineering Projects[J]. Construction and Management 2008, (3):148~154.

Robert L. K. Tiong. Risk assessment on contractor's pricing Strategies[J]. Journal of Construction Economics and Management}2008, (11):234~240.

Irem Dike Mnzdoganmetal. A decision support frame work for Project Sponsors in the planning stage of build operate transfer (BOT) projects[J]. Journal of construction Economics and Management 2009, (2):96-101.

P. Townsend. Macro simulation of project risks a practical way forward[J]. Project Management, 2010, (10):1120-1126.

Thomas Kull. The risk of second-tier supplier failures in serial supply chains: Implications for order policies and distributor autonomy[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 186(3):1158~1174.

Ben-David, LRabinowitz, G. Raz. T. Economic optimization of management efforts[J]. The Israel Institute of Business Research, 2002, 7(1): 123~136.

Daniel O. Cajueiro, Benjamin M. Tabak. Testing for long-range dependence in world stock markets Chaos[J]. Solitons & Fractals, 2011, 37(3):918~927.

Yu Wentai, et al. Configuration and Selection Optimization of an Underwater Pile Hammer Hydraulic Pump Based on FAHP.24(2023): 137-140.doi:10.20087/j.cnki.1672-8114.2023.24.044.

Downloads

Published

15-05-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Trinh Thi Linh. (2024). Research on Risk Assessment of Vietnam EPC Wind Power Projects based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 15(1), 282-287. https://doi.org/10.54097/3e261e26